“Zucker et al. (2013). Memo outlining evidence for change for gender identity disorder in the DSM-5.” – Article summary
There were several changes from the DSM-4 to DSM-5 with regards to gender identity disorder:
- Change the name of gender identity disorder (GID) to gender dysphoria
This is done because it is less stigmatizing and highlights a conceptual change in the diagnosis. - Decouple the diagnosis of GID from the sexual dysfunctions and place it in a separate chapter
This is done because there is no clear theoretical overlap and it is less stigmatizing. - Change in the introductory descriptor to the point A criterion
This was changed because incongruence is a better descriptor because it does not only pertain to the gender binary (1), gender aligns better with people with a sex disorder (2), there is no need to mention a single potential causal mechanism (3) and there is a clearer distinction between transient GD and persistent GD as time has been added to the descriptor (4). - Merging of point A and B criteria from the DSM-IV
The criteria are merged because the distinction between the two criteria is not supported by factor analytic studies. - For children, the A1 criterion is proposed to be a necessary indicator
This was changed because there are children who meet all the behavioural signs but do not express a desire to be the other sex. - For children, there are minor wording changes to the diagnostic criteria
This was changed to simplify the underlying construct. - For adolescents and adults, the proposed diagnostic criteria are polythetic in form and are more detailed
This was changed to capture a reference to intensity or frequency. The focus now is on a discrepancy between experienced and assigned gender rather than cross-gender identification. - Elimination of sexual attraction specifier for adolescents and adults
This was changed because sexual attraction only plays a minor role in contemporary treatment protocols or decisions. - For the point B criterion, there is a change in wording to capture distress, impairment and increased risk of suffering and disability
This was changed because people who are transitioning may only experience distress when their transitioning process is blocked. - Inclusion of a subtype pertaining the presence of a DSD (i.e. intersex)
This was changed because DSD individuals with gender dysphoria have both similarities and differences with individuals with gender dysphoria with no known DND. - Inclusion of a post-transition specifier
This was changed because many individuals after transitioning do not meet the criteria set for gender dysphoria anymore.
The old introductory descriptor was a strong and persistent cross-gender identification. The A1 criterion refers to repeatedly stated a desire to be or insistence that one is the other sex. A polythetic form refers to the diagnostic criteria sharing a lot of symptoms among each other which are not essential for diagnosis.
There are several validators of gender dysphoria:
- Antecedent validators
- Familial aggregation
There is a hereditary component of gender identity. - Sociodemographic and cultural factors
There are more males than females with gender dysphoria and occurs across cultures. - Environmental risk factors
The boys with gender dysphoria have more brothers (1), are born later than their siblings (i.e. fraternal birth order effect) (2) and have a lower birth weight (3).
- Familial aggregation
- Concurrent validators
- Cognitive, emotional, temperamental and personality correlates
The boys with gender dysphoria perform more poorly on visual-spatial tasks than on verbal tasks and have a lower physical activity level. The girls with gender dysphoria have higher physical activity levels. - Genetics
There are no known genes linked to gender dysphoria. - Hormonal factors
There is mixed evidence regarding abnormalities related to molecular genetics and gender dysphoria. - Neuroanatomy
There may be differences in neuroanatomy in gender dysphoria (e.g. females identifying as males having more similar ‘male’ brain structures) but there is no consensus. - Cerebral dominance and anthropometrics
There is an elevated rate of left-handedness in males with gender dysphoria, though it is not sure whether it is diagnostic-specific. - Patterns of comorbidity
The boys with gender dysphoria have elevated rates of internalizing problems and this is more common than externalizing problems. The rates between internalizing and externalizing problems are more equal for girls with gender dysphoria. There is a higher morbidity and suicide rate for people with gender dysphoria.
- Cognitive, emotional, temperamental and personality correlates
- Predictive validators
- Diagnostic stability
The persistence rate of gender dysphoria is higher compared to the base rate of gender dysphoria, demonstrating diagnostic stability. Gender-related distress often does not decrease until there is treatment with hormones or surgery. - Course of the condition
The course of gender dysphoria appears to become more fixed over developmental time with narrowing of plasticity as individuals reach adolescence or adulthood. - Response to treatment
The successful transition makes the diagnostic criteria not applicable anymore and tends to decrease distress.
- Diagnostic stability
People diagnosed with DSD are at a heightened risk for gender dysphoria. Chromosomal females who have been exposed to normal levels of prenatal androgen have an elevated rate of gender dysphoria. This also holds for chromosomal males who are exposed to male-typical prenatal androgen level who are assigned female at birth due to the ambiguity of genitals.
Join with a free account for more service, or become a member for full access to exclusives and extra support of WorldSupporter >>
Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Interim exam 1 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
- “Eagly & Wood (2013). The nature-nurture debates: 25 years of challenges in understanding the psychology of gender.” – Article summary
- “Hyde & Delamater (2017). Gender roles and stereotypes.” – Article summary
- “Petersen & Hyde (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993 – 2007.” – Article summary
- “Vanwesenbeeck (2009). Doing gender in sex and sex research.” – Article summary
- “Cretella, Rosik, & Howsepian (2019). Sex and gender are distinct variables critical to health: Comment on Hyde, Bigler, Joel, Tate, and van Anders (2019).” – Article summary
- “Davy (2015). The DSM-5 and the politics of diagnosing transpeople.” – Article summary
- “Hyde et al. (2019). The future of sex and gender in psychology: Five challenges to the gender binary.” – Article summary
- “Kuyper & Wijsen (2013). Gender identities and gender dysphoria in the Netherlands.” – Article summary
- “Reilly (2019). Gender can be a continuous variable, not just a categorical one: Comment on Hyde, Bigler, Joel, Tate, and van Anders (2019). – Article summary
- “Zucker et al. (2013). Memo outlining evidence for change for gender identity disorder in the DSM-5.” – Article summary
- “Althof et al. (2017). Opinion paper: On the diagnosis/classification of sexual arousal concerns in women.” – Article summary
- “Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Lecture 1 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)”
- “Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Lecture 2 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)”
- “Balon & Clayton (2014). Female sexual interest/arousal disorder: A diagnosis out of thin air.” – Article summary
- “Basson (2014). On the definition of female sexual interest/arousal disorder.” – Article summary
- “Graham, Boyton, & Gould (2017). Challenging narratives of ‘dysfunction’. “ – Article summary
- “Graham, Brotto, & Zucker (2014). Response to Balon and Clayton (2014): Female sexual interest/arousal disorder is a diagnosis more on firm ground than thin air.” – Article summary
- “Hyde (2019). Kinds of sexual disorders.” – Article summary
- “Toates (2017). Explaining desire: Multiple perspectives.” – Article summary
- “Toates (2017). Arousal.” – Article summary
Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Full course summary (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
- “Eagly & Wood (2013). The nature-nurture debates: 25 years of challenges in understanding the psychology of gender.” – Article summary
- “Hyde & Delamater (2017). Gender roles and stereotypes.” – Article summary
- “Petersen & Hyde (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993 – 2007.” – Article summary
- “Vanwesenbeeck (2009). Doing gender in sex and sex research.” – Article summary
- “Cretella, Rosik, & Howsepian (2019). Sex and gender are distinct variables critical to health: Comment on Hyde, Bigler, Joel, Tate, and van Anders (2019).” – Article summary
- “Davy (2015). The DSM-5 and the politics of diagnosing transpeople.” – Article summary
- “Hyde et al. (2019). The future of sex and gender in psychology: Five challenges to the gender binary.” – Article summary
- “Kuyper & Wijsen (2013). Gender identities and gender dysphoria in the Netherlands.” – Article summary
- “Reilly (2019). Gender can be a continuous variable, not just a categorical one: Comment on Hyde, Bigler, Joel, Tate, and van Anders (2019). – Article summary
- “Zucker et al. (2013). Memo outlining evidence for change for gender identity disorder in the DSM-5.” – Article summary
- “Althof et al. (2017). Opinion paper: On the diagnosis/classification of sexual arousal concerns in women.” – Article summary
- “Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Lecture 1 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)”
- “Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Lecture 2 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)”
- “Balon & Clayton (2014). Female sexual interest/arousal disorder: A diagnosis out of thin air.” – Article summary
- “Basson (2014). On the definition of female sexual interest/arousal disorder.” – Article summary
- “Graham, Boyton, & Gould (2017). Challenging narratives of ‘dysfunction’. “ – Article summary
- “Graham, Brotto, & Zucker (2014). Response to Balon and Clayton (2014): Female sexual interest/arousal disorder is a diagnosis more on firm ground than thin air.” – Article summary
- “Hyde (2019). Kinds of sexual disorders.” – Article summary
- “Toates (2017). Explaining desire: Multiple perspectives.” – Article summary
- “Toates (2017). Arousal.” – Article summary
- “Brewin et al. (2009). Reformulating PTSD for DSM-V: Life after criterion A.” – Article summary
- “Cacioppo et al. (2015). Loneliness: Clinical import and interventions.” – Article summary
- “DiTomasso, Brannen-McNulty, Ross, & Burgess (2003). Attachment styles, social skills and loneliness in young adults.” – Article summary
- “DSM-5. Posttraumatic stress disorder.” – Article summary
- “Ozer, Lipsey, & Weiss (2003). Predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder and symptoms in adults: A meta-analysis.” – Article summary
- “Pincus & Gurtman (2006). Interpersonal theory and the interpersonal circumplex.” – Article summary
- “Schaver & Mikulincer (2011). An attachment-theory framework for conceptualizing interpersonal behaviour.” – Article summary
- “Ehlers & Clark (2000). A cognitive model of posttraumatic stress disorder.” – Article summary
- “Forest & Wood (2012). When social networking is not working: Individuals with low self-esteem recognize but do not reap the benefits of self-disclosure on Facebook.” – Article summary
- “Nadkarni & Hofmann (2012). Why do people use Facebook?” – Article summary
- “Van den Hout & Engelhard (2012). How does EMDR work?” – Article summary
- “Van Emmerik & Kamphuis (2015). Writing therapies for post-traumatic stress and post-traumatic stress disorder: A review of procedures and outcomes.” – Article summary
- “Watkins et al. (2018). Treating PTSD: A review of evidence-based psychotherapy interventions.” – Article summary
Work for JoHo WorldSupporter?
Volunteering: WorldSupporter moderators and Summary Supporters
Volunteering: Share your summaries or study notes
Student jobs: Part-time work as study assistant in Leiden

Contributions: posts
Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Interim exam 1 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
This bundle contains all the information needed for the first interim exam for the course "Clinical Perspective on Today's Issues" given at the University of Amsterdam. It contains lecture information, information from the relevant books and all the articles. The following
...Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Full course summary (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
This bundle contains all the information needed for the for the course "Clinical Perspective on Today's Issues" given at the University of Amsterdam. It contains lecture information, information from the relevant books and all the articles. The following is included:
...Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Article overview (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
This bundle contains all the articles included in the course "Clinical Perspective on Today's Issues" given at the University of Amsterdam. The following is included:
- “Eagly & Wood (2013). The nature-nurture debates: 25 years of challenges in understanding











Add new contribution