“Hyde et al. (2019). The future of sex and gender in psychology: Five challenges to the gender binary.” – Article summary
The gender binary assumes that one’s category membership is biologically determined (1), apparent at birth (2), stable over time (3), a powerful predictor of psychological variables (4) and salient and meaningful to the self (5). There is an idea that brains are gendered (i.e. male and female brains). In neuroscience requires two assumptions:
- Sex is a dimorphic system (i.e. system that can only take two forms).
- Effect of sex on other systems (e.g. brain) is characterized by dimorphic outcome (e.g. male vs. female brain).
For a system to show dimorphism, each of its elements should be dimorphic. Furthermore, all the elements within an individual should be internally consistent (i.e. either all in the form typical of males or typical of females). The brain sex differences are context-dependent. However, it is unlikely that brains are internally consistent and dimorphic. Mosaicism (i.e. one typical female-part in the brain and one typical male-part in the brain) is most common in the human brain.
The idea of gender binary in behavioural neuroendocrinology involves two assumptions:
- The reproductive glands are dimorphic (i.e. male and female hormones).
- The levels of these hormones are genetically determined and fixed.
These assumptions do not hold as both men and women have testosterone and oestrogen. Furthermore, the average level of these hormones does not differ between men and women. The differences in levels of hormones vary across the lifespan. Thus, the gender binary cannot be completed based on androgens and oestrogens.
The reproductive glands are not fixed and innate as their levels vary widely within individuals. Hormones are influenced by social context. For example, testosterone decreases with supportive environments and increases with competitiveness. Furthermore, gendered expectations and lived experiences can shape hormones.
Gender binary in psychological research involves the assumption that there are only two discrete categories of people (i.e. males and females), implicitly stating that there is no overlap between the two categories.
People possess both feminine and masculine psychological characteristics. Internal consistency in personality traits (e.g. all masculine traits) is extremely rare. Stereotypes of men and women exist but individuals who consistently match these stereotypes are very rare. T
Transgender and non-binary people have largely been ignored in psychological research. Psychological research on transgender and non-binary people lead to three major challenges to the gender binary:
- It shows that gender-assigned categories are imperfect for predicting how a person will self-label their gender identity.
- It shows that the assumption that gender/sex only comprises the dichotomous categories of male and female is not correct.
- It shows that self-labelling of gender (i.e. being gender) is different from enacting gender roles and stereotypes (i.e. doing gender).
Gender identity is not invariably linked to sex category at birth. Gender could be seen as a bundle of separable constructs.
Being gender could be a precondition for doing gender in ways that are not tied to the birth-assigned gender category. This means that realizing you are a boy or a girl leads you to pay attention to the relevant stereotypes for the self-labelled categories. One’s self-assigned gender identity can focus a person’s attention on how gender is expected to be done within that category.
Gender emerges as a psychologically salient and meaningful dimension in childhood and is not the inevitable result of an innate mechanism. There are several practices that establish gender as a salient and binary category:
- Heightening the perceptual discriminability of gender
This is heightened due to social and cultural norms (e.g. different clothing for males and females) and this makes it more likely that children categorize each other into binary gender categories. - Linguistic labelling of gender
Language affects a child’s conceptualization and makes categorization easier. Categorization in language makes inferences about category members easier. Linguistic labelling of gender leads to children using the gender binary. - Explicit and implicit use of gender for sorting
Exposing children to environments that are characterized by gender sorting contributes to children’s attention to sorting people by gender. Explicit sorting makes use of linguistic labels whereas implicit sorting makes use of context.
The developmental intergroup theory states that children’s endogenous qualities (e.g. cognitive capacities) interact in dynamic ways with their environmental context to induce children to attend to, categorize others and develop stereotypes and prejudice concerning gender.
There are several costs of using the gender binary:
- Reliance on the gender binary is an obstacle to scientific progress (e.g. only studying nurturing behaviour in women).
- Gender binary denies and denigrates the existence of individuals who fall outside the binary.
- Gender binary leads to unequal treatment (1), shape self-conceptions (2), undermine individuals’ performance in stereotyped domains (3) and shape legal and social policies (4).
Gender stereotypes may lead to biases in mental health diagnoses and treatment in clinical practice. It may also shape the diagnosis and treatment for issues specifically related to gender. Gender stereotypes may obscure the understanding of etiological factors as well as their choices of diagnosis and treatment.
Sex cannot be studied without consideration of gender. It is multidimensional and each component is dynamic and responsive. Gender should only be used in research to make sure that the sample is representative. It may be useful to measure gender in a continuous way. However, asking people about gender in research implies that this is important.
The term gender/sex allows researchers to develop integrated research questions and paradigms that simultaneously explore biological and sociocultural influences that relate to gender and sex.
Join with a free account for more service, or become a member for full access to exclusives and extra support of WorldSupporter >>
Concept of JoHo WorldSupporter
JoHo WorldSupporter mission and vision:
- JoHo wants to enable people and organizations to develop and work better together, and thereby contribute to a tolerant tolerant and sustainable world. Through physical and online platforms, it support personal development and promote international cooperation is encouraged.
JoHo concept:
- As a JoHo donor, member or insured, you provide support to the JoHo objectives. JoHo then supports you with tools, coaching and benefits in the areas of personal development and international activities.
- JoHo's core services include: study support, competence development, coaching and insurance mediation when departure abroad.
Join JoHo WorldSupporter!
for a modest and sustainable investment in yourself, and a valued contribution to what JoHo stands for
- 1496 keer gelezen
Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Interim exam 1 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
- “Eagly & Wood (2013). The nature-nurture debates: 25 years of challenges in understanding the psychology of gender.” – Article summary
- “Hyde & Delamater (2017). Gender roles and stereotypes.” – Article summary
- “Petersen & Hyde (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993 – 2007.” – Article summary
- “Vanwesenbeeck (2009). Doing gender in sex and sex research.” – Article summary
- “Cretella, Rosik, & Howsepian (2019). Sex and gender are distinct variables critical to health: Comment on Hyde, Bigler, Joel, Tate, and van Anders (2019).” – Article summary
- “Davy (2015). The DSM-5 and the politics of diagnosing transpeople.” – Article summary
- “Hyde et al. (2019). The future of sex and gender in psychology: Five challenges to the gender binary.” – Article summary
- “Kuyper & Wijsen (2013). Gender identities and gender dysphoria in the Netherlands.” – Article summary
- “Reilly (2019). Gender can be a continuous variable, not just a categorical one: Comment on Hyde, Bigler, Joel, Tate, and van Anders (2019). – Article summary
- “Zucker et al. (2013). Memo outlining evidence for change for gender identity disorder in the DSM-5.” – Article summary
- “Althof et al. (2017). Opinion paper: On the diagnosis/classification of sexual arousal concerns in women.” – Article summary
- “Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Lecture 1 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)”
- “Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Lecture 2 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)”
- “Balon & Clayton (2014). Female sexual interest/arousal disorder: A diagnosis out of thin air.” – Article summary
- “Basson (2014). On the definition of female sexual interest/arousal disorder.” – Article summary
- “Graham, Boyton, & Gould (2017). Challenging narratives of ‘dysfunction’. “ – Article summary
- “Graham, Brotto, & Zucker (2014). Response to Balon and Clayton (2014): Female sexual interest/arousal disorder is a diagnosis more on firm ground than thin air.” – Article summary
- “Hyde (2019). Kinds of sexual disorders.” – Article summary
- “Toates (2017). Explaining desire: Multiple perspectives.” – Article summary
- “Toates (2017). Arousal.” – Article summary
Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Full course summary (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
- “Eagly & Wood (2013). The nature-nurture debates: 25 years of challenges in understanding the psychology of gender.” – Article summary
- “Hyde & Delamater (2017). Gender roles and stereotypes.” – Article summary
- “Petersen & Hyde (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993 – 2007.” – Article summary
- “Vanwesenbeeck (2009). Doing gender in sex and sex research.” – Article summary
- “Cretella, Rosik, & Howsepian (2019). Sex and gender are distinct variables critical to health: Comment on Hyde, Bigler, Joel, Tate, and van Anders (2019).” – Article summary
- “Davy (2015). The DSM-5 and the politics of diagnosing transpeople.” – Article summary
- “Hyde et al. (2019). The future of sex and gender in psychology: Five challenges to the gender binary.” – Article summary
- “Kuyper & Wijsen (2013). Gender identities and gender dysphoria in the Netherlands.” – Article summary
- “Reilly (2019). Gender can be a continuous variable, not just a categorical one: Comment on Hyde, Bigler, Joel, Tate, and van Anders (2019). – Article summary
- “Zucker et al. (2013). Memo outlining evidence for change for gender identity disorder in the DSM-5.” – Article summary
- “Althof et al. (2017). Opinion paper: On the diagnosis/classification of sexual arousal concerns in women.” – Article summary
- “Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Lecture 1 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)”
- “Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Lecture 2 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)”
- “Balon & Clayton (2014). Female sexual interest/arousal disorder: A diagnosis out of thin air.” – Article summary
- “Basson (2014). On the definition of female sexual interest/arousal disorder.” – Article summary
- “Graham, Boyton, & Gould (2017). Challenging narratives of ‘dysfunction’. “ – Article summary
- “Graham, Brotto, & Zucker (2014). Response to Balon and Clayton (2014): Female sexual interest/arousal disorder is a diagnosis more on firm ground than thin air.” – Article summary
- “Hyde (2019). Kinds of sexual disorders.” – Article summary
- “Toates (2017). Explaining desire: Multiple perspectives.” – Article summary
- “Toates (2017). Arousal.” – Article summary
- “Brewin et al. (2009). Reformulating PTSD for DSM-V: Life after criterion A.” – Article summary
- “Cacioppo et al. (2015). Loneliness: Clinical import and interventions.” – Article summary
- “DiTomasso, Brannen-McNulty, Ross, & Burgess (2003). Attachment styles, social skills and loneliness in young adults.” – Article summary
- “DSM-5. Posttraumatic stress disorder.” – Article summary
- “Ozer, Lipsey, & Weiss (2003). Predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder and symptoms in adults: A meta-analysis.” – Article summary
- “Pincus & Gurtman (2006). Interpersonal theory and the interpersonal circumplex.” – Article summary
- “Schaver & Mikulincer (2011). An attachment-theory framework for conceptualizing interpersonal behaviour.” – Article summary
- “Ehlers & Clark (2000). A cognitive model of posttraumatic stress disorder.” – Article summary
- “Forest & Wood (2012). When social networking is not working: Individuals with low self-esteem recognize but do not reap the benefits of self-disclosure on Facebook.” – Article summary
- “Nadkarni & Hofmann (2012). Why do people use Facebook?” – Article summary
- “Van den Hout & Engelhard (2012). How does EMDR work?” – Article summary
- “Van Emmerik & Kamphuis (2015). Writing therapies for post-traumatic stress and post-traumatic stress disorder: A review of procedures and outcomes.” – Article summary
- “Watkins et al. (2018). Treating PTSD: A review of evidence-based psychotherapy interventions.” – Article summary
Work for JoHo WorldSupporter?
Volunteering: WorldSupporter moderators and Summary Supporters
Volunteering: Share your summaries or study notes
Student jobs: Part-time work as study assistant in Leiden

Contributions: posts
Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Interim exam 1 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
This bundle contains all the information needed for the first interim exam for the course "Clinical Perspective on Today's Issues" given at the University of Amsterdam. It contains lecture information, information from the relevant books and all the articles. The following
...Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Full course summary (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
This bundle contains all the information needed for the for the course "Clinical Perspective on Today's Issues" given at the University of Amsterdam. It contains lecture information, information from the relevant books and all the articles. The following is included:
...Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Article overview (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
This bundle contains all the articles included in the course "Clinical Perspective on Today's Issues" given at the University of Amsterdam. The following is included:
- “Eagly & Wood (2013). The nature-nurture debates: 25 years of challenges in understanding
Search only via club, country, goal, study, topic or sector











Add new contribution