Psychology and behavioral sciences - Theme
- Login of registreer om te kunnen reageren
- 37775 keer gelezen
This is an introduction to the science of happiness. It provides a catalogue of the main questions that have been posed about happiness across millennia. By doing this, it can explain why we look at happiness from a scientifical standpoint, not just from a philosophical standpoint. First, it will be explained what happiness is and how it can be measured. After that, the possibility, desirability, and justifiability of happiness will be explored. Lastly, this article will try to answer the question of how to be happy.
In philosophy, there are roughly two ways of understanding happiness. Hedonic theories of happiness suppose happiness is "feeling good". Eudaimonic theories of happiness on the other hand, suppose happiness is "doing good". But there are still many ways to interpret feeling and doing good. Hedonic and eudaimonic happiness also overlap in a lot of ways. Empirical attempts to distinguish hedonic happiness from eudaimonic happiness have proved to be challenging and tend to yield inconsistent findings.
It is difficult to define happiness, but we need a single definition of happiness to be able to study it scientifically. Psychologists that started the study of happiness, were set to this test of defining happiness. They came up with the concept of subjective well-being. Subjective well-being refers to people's evaluations of their lives and encompasses both affective and cognitive elements. People's own evaluations are important in this definition, so that we can study it by self-report measures. Also important is that psychologists look at both affective and cognitive elements, so that they look at both hedonic and eudaimonic happiness.
If we want to find out if happiness is possible or not, we need to make the definition of happiness even clearer. If we see happiness as a perfect, pure, and perpetual state, a complete absence of negativity and constant positivity, it is impossible. Searching for this kind of happiness is even unhealthy, because it sets you up for disappointment, making you less happy in the long run.
But if we look at happiness in a more realistic way, it seems entirely possible for people to experience predominantly positive emotions and be satisfied with their lives. This is what recent findings in the science of happiness suggest.
Happiness is thus possible, but for whom? There is an important second question in the possibility of happiness. Can anybody who sets their mind to it become happy? Early answers to this question were not very encouraging. But this comes from the fact that people used to see happiness as something that was bestowed on a person on the basis of fortune, fate, or God. You can see this in the etymology of the word happiness in most Indo-European languages. Think of the Dutch word "geluk" that means both luck and happiness. Happiness was not thought of as something that we can control ourselves.
Recent studies have found that luck is an important part of happiness, but there is also a part of happiness that we can control. Lyubomirsky et al. thought that 50% of someone's happiness was genetically determined, 10% determined by life circumstances and 40% could be achieved with intentional activities. Different psychologists have used different numbers, but we can at least conclude that happiness is partly attainable for everyone. Someone with genes that make them very negative and sad, may never reach the same happiness as someone with "happy genes", but they can make themselves happier than they were before.
Even though we are able to control our happiness to some extent, some people think we should not try to pursue happiness. The idea here is that the search for happiness is self-defeating; the harder we strive for happiness, the further we will retreat from it.
It is easy to see that the pursuit of happiness could thwart happiness under certain circumstances. We have already discussed the unrealistic versions of happiness that only disappoint people when they reach for it. Obsessions with happiness are not healthy. And no one will be happy all the time. It is much healthier and more effective for your overall happiness to accept negative feelings as well.
But interventions to increase happiness do work. This suggests that deliberately pursuing happiness does not necessarily have to be self-defeating. Happiness can be desired and pursued, but we need to have and accurate understanding of what happiness entails. This is why the science of happiness is so important. It helps us to understand what exactly happiness is and to give people more realistic expectations in their pursuit of happiness.
Happiness might be possible and desirable, but is the pursuit of happiness also justifiable? Some people think that happy people are stupid, self-centered, or insensitive. But this is not backed up by scientific evidence. Happiness even helps people be more productive, form better social relationships and be more altruistic. Also, our personal happiness is deeply connected with other people's happiness. Happiness is not egocentric, but social. So yes, happiness is also justifiable.
Now that we know that happiness is desirable, possible, and justifiable, we want to know where and how we can find it. There are some ideas about this that have been proven to be wrong by the science of happiness. These are the places we can not find happiness in:
Now that we know where we should not search for happiness, we can take a look at the effective ways of achieving happiness:
Join with a free account for more service, or become a member for full access to exclusives and extra support of WorldSupporter >>
JoHo WorldSupporter mission and vision:
JoHo concept:
Volunteering: WorldSupporter moderators and Summary Supporters
Volunteering: Share your summaries or study notes
Student jobs: Part-time work as study assistant in Leiden
Search only via club, country, goal, study, topic or sector
Select any filter and click on Search to see results