Research methods in psychology by B. Morling (third edition) – Chapter 4 summary

There are two historical examples of studies that violated several ethical criteria.

  1. Tuskegee Syphilis Study
    This experiment involves black men diagnosed with syphilis, who were lied to, not told that the experiment was about syphilis and intentionally not treated. Participants in this study were not treated respectfully, they were harmed and the researcher targeted a disadvantaged social group in this study.
  2. Milgram Obedience Studies
    This experiment shows that ethical violations are often much more nuanced. Participants in this experiment were debriefed after the experiment. It also shows that balancing the potential risks to participants and the value of the knowledge gained is not an easy decision.

The Belmont Report outlines three main principles for guiding ethical decision making:

  1. Principle of respect for persons
    This includes two provisions. The participants should be treated as autonomous agents. Each person is entitled to the precaution of informed consent. People with less autonomy (e.g: children, mentally disabilities) should be protected. Coercion is an implicit or an explicit suggestion that those who do not participate will suffer a negative consequence.
  2. The principle of beneficence
    Researchers must take precautions to protect the participants of harm and to ensure their well-being. Valuable knowledge must be gained while inflicting as less as possible harm. To prevent harm by collecting personal data, the study can be conducted as an anonymous study. In a confidential study, researchers collect some identifying information, but prevent it from being disclosed.
  3. The principle of justice
    This calls for a fair balance between the kinds of people who participate in a study and the kinds of people who benefit from it.

The APA outlines five general principles for guiding individual aspects of ethical behaviour. Three of the give general principles are the same principles as in the Belmont Report. The other two are:

  1. Fidelity and responsibility
    Establish relationships of trust. Accept the responsibility for professional behaviour (e.g: a psychologist not treating a student or a professor not dating a student).
  2. Integrity
    Strive to be accurate, truthful and honest (e.g: professors are obligated to teach accurately).

The APA lists ten specific ethical standards. These standards are similar to enforceable rules or laws.

  1. Institutional review boards
    An institutional review board is a committee responsible for interpreting ethical principles and ensuring that research using human participants is conducted ethically.

Standard

Definition

Institutional review board

This is a committee responsible for interpreting ethical principles and ensuring that research using human participants is conducted ethically.

Informed consent

This is the researcher’s obligation to explain the study to potential participants in everyday language and give them a chance to decide whether to participate.

Deception

Deception through omission is withholding details of the study from participants. Deception through commission is actively lying to the participants

Debriefing

Participants must be debriefed after the experiment if the experiment uses deception.

Data fabrication and data falsification

Data fabrication occurs when instead of recording what really happened in a study, researchers invent data that fit their hypotheses. Data falsification occurs when researchers influence a study’s results (e.g: selectively removing some results).

Plagiarism

This is representing the ideas or words of others as one’s own. The failure to put the original source in one’s own words is a form of plagiarism as well.

Animal research

There is legal protection for research animals. There must be as few as possible, they must be treated humanely and the researchers must be sure that the research is valuable enough to justify using animal subjects.

When conducting animal research, the three R’s apply:

  1. Replacement
    Researchers should find alternatives to animals in research when possible.
  2. Refinement
    Researchers must modify experimental procedures and other aspects of animal care to minimize or eliminate animal distress.
  3. Reduction
    Researchers should adopt experimental designs and procedures that require the fewest animal subjects possible.

Animal right groups typically use two arguments. Animals experience the same type of suffering humans experience and animals have inherent rights, equal to those of humans. Animal researchers defend their use of animal subjects with three primary arguments: it brings numerous benefits to humans and animals alike, animal researchers are sensitive to animal welfare and researchers have successfully reduced the number of animals they need to use because of new procedures that do not require animal testing.

 

Image

Access: 
Public

Image

Join WorldSupporter!
This content is used in:

Summary of Research methods in psychology by Morling - 3rd edition

Research Methods & Statistics – Interim exam 3 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)

Search a summary

Image

 

 

Contributions: posts

Help other WorldSupporters with additions, improvements and tips

Wat een mooie overzichtelijke

Wat een mooie overzichtelijke samenvatting! ik merk dat statistiek voor veel mensen behoorlijk lastig is. Jouw samenvatting is daarom echt superhandig! Heb jij het tentamen al gemaakt? 

Antwoord op Lydwine

Dankjewel! Ik heb het tentamen zeker al gedaan en er uiteindelijk een 8.5 voor gehaald! :)

Ha kijk! Dat kon natuurlijk

Ha kijk! Dat kon natuurlijk ook niet anders ;-) supernice!

Add new contribution

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Image

Spotlight: topics

Check the related and most recent topics and summaries:
Institutions, jobs and organizations:
Activity abroad, study field of working area:
This content is also used in .....

Image

Check how to use summaries on WorldSupporter.org

Online access to all summaries, study notes en practice exams

How and why use WorldSupporter.org for your summaries and study assistance?

  • For free use of many of the summaries and study aids provided or collected by your fellow students.
  • For free use of many of the lecture and study group notes, exam questions and practice questions.
  • For use of all exclusive summaries and study assistance for those who are member with JoHo WorldSupporter with online access
  • For compiling your own materials and contributions with relevant study help
  • For sharing and finding relevant and interesting summaries, documents, notes, blogs, tips, videos, discussions, activities, recipes, side jobs and more.

Using and finding summaries, notes and practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter

There are several ways to navigate the large amount of summaries, study notes en practice exams on JoHo WorldSupporter.

  1. Use the summaries home pages for your study or field of study
  2. Use the check and search pages for summaries and study aids by field of study, subject or faculty
  3. Use and follow your (study) organization
    • by using your own student organization as a starting point, and continuing to follow it, easily discover which study materials are relevant to you
    • this option is only available through partner organizations
  4. Check or follow authors or other WorldSupporters
  5. Use the menu above each page to go to the main theme pages for summaries
    • Theme pages can be found for international studies as well as Dutch studies

Do you want to share your summaries with JoHo WorldSupporter and its visitors?

Quicklinks to fields of study for summaries and study assistance

Main summaries home pages:

Main study fields:

Main study fields NL:

Follow the author: JesperN
Work for WorldSupporter

Image

JoHo can really use your help!  Check out the various student jobs here that match your studies, improve your competencies, strengthen your CV and contribute to a more tolerant world

Working for JoHo as a student in Leyden

Parttime werken voor JoHo

Statistics
2064 3