Summary of Developmental Neuropsychology: A Clinical Approach by Anderson a.o. - 2nd edition

Summary with Developmental Neuropsychology: A Clinical Approach

    Read ahead for the summaries per chapter

    Image

    Check: summaries and supporting content in full
    How is Developmental neuropsychology: A clinical approach structured? - Chapter 0

    How is Developmental neuropsychology: A clinical approach structured? - Chapter 0

    This updated version of Developmental Neuropsychology: A Clinical Approach addresses key issues in child neuropsychology. In doing so, the emphasis is not on current research issues. Instead, the focus is on evidence-informed clinical practice. Consequently, although research findings may be presented, the emphasis is on what is relevant for the (a) assessment, (b) treatment, and (c) management of paediatric conditions. The authors focus specifically on the following four areas:

    1. The natural history of the childhood central nervous system (CNS).
    2. Processes of (ab)normal cerebral and cognitive development; brain plasticity, and the impact of early CNS insult.
    3. A model that describes the complex interaction among biological, psychosocial, and cognitive factors in children that suffer from brain injury.
    4. The principles of evidence-based assessment, diagnosis, and intervention. 
    Access: 
    Public
    What is child neuropsychology and how has it developed over the past twenty years? - Chapter 1

    What is child neuropsychology and how has it developed over the past twenty years? - Chapter 1

    Child neuropsychology, also known as paediatric neuropsychology, is the study of association between brain and behavior within the context of an immature, but rapidly developing, brain and the implementation of knowledge gained from that into clinical practice. The main focus of child psychology is to generate a developmentally informed knowledge base that facilitates optimal understanding of the impact of early brain injury on brain development and child function, which in turn can be used as guidance for designing evidence-based interventions to minimise disability.

    Child neuropsychology takes its foundations from adult neuropsychology. Yet, whereas adult neuropsychology relates to a more static and tightly organised system, child neuropsychology related more to a dynamic path that can be characterized by plasticity, vulnerability, and critical periods. Consequently, adult-based models needed to be adapted to be relevant for implementation with infants, children, and adolescents. Nowadays, developmental perspectives have extended our knowledge base significantly, acknowledging the complex interplay of neurologic, cognitive, socio-emotional, and environmental factors important to child neuropsychology.

    Which principle has played an important role in the early development of child neuropsychology?

    The earliest contributions to child neuropsychology can be traced back to researchers such as Kennard (1936; 1940) and Teuber (1974), who gave descriptions of plasticity and recovery of function after childhood brain damage. These researchers documented relatively good recovery following early brain insult. This is also nicely covered in the Kennard principle: "If you're going to have brain damage, have it early". This early research offered an important contribution to the field, because, among others, they acknowledge the unique processes that may be acting in the developing brain following an injury or insult. 

    Later research added information about critical periods to the knowledge base, improving our understanding of the mechanisms at play following early brain insult. A critical period is defined by Mogford and Bishop (1993) as: "the time window during which external influences have a significant effect" (p. 252). It was found that early brain insult can have different effects at different times throughout development and, sometimes, may even be more destructive than later injury, because some aspects of cognitive development are critically dependent on the integrity of particular cerebral structures at specific stages of development. 

    Which two seminal models (developed in the late 1980s) had, and still have, a major influence on the field?

    To date, only a handful of studies have attempted to formulate brain - behaviour paradigms of a truly developmental nature. There is basically no theoretical framework that successfully integrates biological, psychological, and environmental dimensions in a clinical meaningful way. It has even been argued that there has been little theoretical progress since two seminal models that have been developed in the late 1980s. These models are: (1) Non-verbal learning disability, developed by Byron Rourke in 1989, and; (2) Multidimensional age at insult; developed by Maureen Dennis (1989).

    Model 1: Non-verbal learning disability (NVLD)

    According to this model, non-verbal learning disability in children is characterized by:

    1. Bilateral tactile - perceptual deficits, more marked on the left side of the body.
    2. Impaired visual recognition and discrimination and visuospatial organisational deficiencies.
    3. Bilateral psychomotor coordination problems, more marked on the left side of the body.
    4. Difficulties managing novel information.

    In addition, children with NVLD may also demonstrate intact skills, in particular within the auditory - verbal domain. These are listed as follows:

    1. Simple motor skills.
    2. Auditory perception.
    3. Rote learning.
    4. Selective and sustained attention for auditory - verbal information.
    5. Basic expressive and receptive language.
    6. Word reading and spelling.

    This model offers an important contribution to the field, because it incorporates knowledge from the neuro dimension with the development of a specific cognitive development; the psych dimension. A key contribution if this model is the linkage between cognitive characteristics to an underlying neurologic explanation; the white matter hypothesis. The underlying assumption of this model is that normal development of white matter is essential for intact child development. 

    Model 2: Multidimensional age at insult

    This 'heuristic' describes the impact of brain damage on language development.
    Skill development can be divided into several levels:

    • Emerging: the ability is in the early stages of acquisition, but is not yet functional.
    • Developing: the ability is partially acquired, but not fully functional.
    • Established: the ability is fully matured. 

    These developmental skills are integrated with three crucial age-related variables:

    • Age at time of lesion; determines the nature of the cognitive dysfunction.
      For example, early lesions are associated with a disrupted onset and rate of language development, whereas later lesions are associated wit a specific symptom pattern, such as high-level language dysfunction, for example impaired pragmatic skills. 
    • Age at testing; early brain insults may cause relatively few problems early after the injury, yet children may "grow onto" deficits with ongoing development, as they fail to acquire age-expected skills.
    • Time since insult; there are different performance patterns at different stages of recovery. 

    Which recently developed models play an important role in the field of neuropsychology?

    Advances in the neurosciences have led to the development of theories that propose a complex relationship between risk factors. More specifically, it is argued that these risk factors interact and vary over time, determining functional outcomes after early brain insult. Within this framework, two familiar models are:

    1. The cognitive reserve model (Dennis and colleagues, 2007):

    • Mediating factor: children differ in their reserve capacity, which is composed by:

      • Brain reserve capacity (BRC).
      • Cognitive reserve capacity (CRC).
    • Moderating factors:
      • Age at the time of brain insult.
      • Age at examination.
      • Time elapsed since brain insult.

    2. Recovery continuum model (Anderson and colleagues, 2011):

    • According to this model, recovery is best understood by considering a continuum approach, whereby various potential risk and resilience factors interact to determine long-term outcome. 

      • Injury: severity, nature, complications.
      • Cognitive skill: simple, complex.
      • Development: age at injury, age at assessment.
      • Environment: distal and proximal factors.

    Another model that is well-established nowadays is the biopsychosocial model. According to this model, threats are numerous and span multiple domains:

    1. The bio dimension: brain (resilience and strengths; risks and weaknesses).
    2. The social dimension: environment (nurturing + stimulating; neglectful; abusive).
    3. The psych dimension: child cognitive and socio-emotional function (healthy functioning; internalising problems, such as anxiety, somatisation, depression, and psychosis; externalising problems, such as hyperactivity, impulsivity, and aggression).

    To more comprehensively study the interacting influences of biology and environment, we need to built robust cross-discipline collaborations. The combined knowledge, in turn, can be translated into ' best' practice in the field to enhance optimal outcomes for children, as well as for the benefit of the community. 

    To conclude, a significant progression has represented itself over the past twenty years. Twenty years ago, understandings were primarily based on adult models of brain lesions. Today, developmental perspectives have extended our knowledge base significantly, acknowledging the interplay between neurologic, cognitive, socio-emotional, and environmental factors important to child neuropsychology. Yet, present models still fall short in explaining the complexities of interruption to a system in a rapid state of development. There still is an unacceptable high degree of unexplained variation in outcome following early brain injury. Future work therefore should focus on improving the prediction of outcome by measuring the interacting influences of parameters from these different domains and their ever-changing matrix throughout childhood.

    Access: 
    Public
    What are the main characteristics of brain development? - Chapter 2

    What are the main characteristics of brain development? - Chapter 2

    Brain development is not a linear process. Instead, it is a complex developmental process with many different developmental mechanisms occurring both in sequence and simultaneously. Roughly speaking, brain development can be divided into two stages: prenatal and post-natal. The first stage, prenatal brain development is mainly concerned with the development of the central nervous system (CNS). In doing so, there is are various dynamic, developmental processes involved: hierarchical progression; regressive and additive processes, and; growth spurts in neurological processes. The second stage, post-natal development, is mainly characterised by elaboration of the brain, in particular dendritic aborisation, myelination, and synaptogenesis.

    Which two stages can be distinguished in brain development? 

    Cerebral development is an ongoing process, beginning early in gestation and continuing into childhood through early adulthood. Brain development can be divided into two phases in which birth is a rough marker for the transition between these two qualitatively distinct stages. The first stage, prenatal development, is mainly concerned with the structural formation of the central nervous system (CNS). This stage is thought to be largely determined by genes. The quickest rate of brain growth occurs during the prenatal stage, when it is estimated that 250,000 brain cells are formed each minute through continuous rapid cell division. The second stage, post-natal development, is mainly characterised by elaboration of the brain, in particular dendritic aborisation, myelination, and synaptogenesis. While these processes are still largely determined genetically, they are more susceptible to the impact of neuronal activity and they are thus more susceptible to environmental and experimental influences.  

    Which three developmental processes characterise cerebral development?

    Cerebral development is not a simple linear process of development. Instead, there is a range of developmental processes, with many occurring simultaneously, reflecting differential developmental timing for various brain regions. These developmental brain processes are:

    • Hierarchical progression: first the brainstem and cerebral regions, then the posterior areas, lastly the anterior regions.
    • Additive and regressive events: 
      • Additive development refers to the ongoing accumulation of growth processes, for example myelination, shown by the increasing connectivity of myelinated white matter from birth to eighteen years. 
      • Regressive development refers to initial overproduction, followed by selective elimination of redundant element. For example, excess synapses are overproduced in infancy and those that do not form functional networks become obsolete connections and are pruned. 
    • Growth spurts in neurological process: brain maturation is not linear, but is characterized by a series of growth spurts. An initial growth spurt is recorded between 1.5 and 5 years, a second growth spurt between 5 and 10 years, and a final growth spurt between 10 and 16 years. These accompany critical periods for development. However, many questions regarding these periods remain. For example, are there different critical periods for different neurobehavioural domains? Do some skills have shorter critical periods than others? 

    Which two classes of cells form the basis for brain development?

    Brain development progresses via the rapid generation of two main classes of cells: neurons and glial cells.

    Neurons form the basic functional unit of the CNS and are responsible for neural transmission within the brain. Neurons consists of four primary components:

    1. Cell body; important for the metabolic functions of the neurons. The cell body holds the RNA and DNA.
    2. Axon; conducting neural impulses away from the cell body; progressively sheated with myelin throughout childhood.
    3. Dendrites; branch off the cell body and receive impulses from other neurons, conducting them towards the cell body. Dendrite spines are the locus of the synapse; they form the location where information is transmitted from one neuron to another.
    4. The presynaptic terminals; where neurotransmitters are stored and released; activate the neurons at the post-synapse. 

    Glial cells play a supportive and nutrient role within the CNS enabling regeneration of damaged neurons. They produce scar tissue to occupy damaged sites and transport nutrients from nerve cells. There are different types of glial cells. Astrocytes form the blood - brain barrier. They support the cellular structure of the brain and contribute to the migration of neurons and cleaning of plug injury sites. Oligodendrocytes are responsible for speeding up the transmission of neural impulses throughout the nervous system by coating axons with myelin. And lastly, microglia clean up injury sites, mainly in the grey matter. 

    What is the impact of prenatal brain dysfunction?

    Prenatal brain dysfunction has different consequences, depending on the timing of the insults. A brief summary is provided in the table below.

    Table 1. Overview of impact of prenatal brain dysfunction, organised by timing of insult
    Timing of insultDescriptionCause / aetiologyClinical manifestations
    Dorsal induction (weeks 3-4)   
    • Myelomeningocele / spina bifida
    Failure of closure of spinal cordGenetic or nutritionMotor and perceptual deficits
    • Anencephaly
    Failure of neural tube to close, causing an absent vault of the skullSevere trauma (between day 18 - week 4)Incompatible with life
    Ventral induction (weeks 5 - 6)   
    • Holoprosencephaly
    Defective division of forebrain: failure to form two (left and right) hemispheresGenetic (for example anomalies in chromosomes 13 or 18)Commonly incompatible with life
    Proliferation (2 - 5 months)   
    • Microencephaly
    Early cessation of cell division, yielding an abnormal small headGenetic or trauma factors (infection, foetal alcohol syndrome)Low intellectual abilities
    • Megalencephaly
    Overproduction or poor elimination of neurons, resulting in an abnormally large brainGeneticNo typical picture
    • Hydranencephaly
    Cystic sacs containing cerebrospinal fluid replacing the cerebral hemispheresPossibly vascular, umbilical cord strangulationIncompatible with life
    Migration (2 - 5 months)   
    • Lissencephaly (agyria)
    Smooth cortex, absence of sulci and gyri, but normal cortica thickness. Neurons in abnormal locations.Disorder of migration (11 - 13 weeks)Severe mental retardation, seizures, neuromotor disorders
    • Schizencephaly
    Agenesis of part of the cerebral wall. Cortical layers are not evident.Disorder of migration (around 8 weeks)Severe mental retardation, seizures, neuromotor disorders
    • Polymicrogyria
    Multiple small and shallow convulations on the brain surface. Neurons in abnormal locations.Disorder of migration (16 - 20 weeks), genetic / infectious mechanismsPossibly: asymptomatic or associated with epilepsy, learning and behaviour problems
    • Agenesis of the corpus callosum
    Absence or malformation of fibres crossing the cerebral hemispheresGenetic (weeks 12 - 22 of gestation)Possibly: asymptotic or associated with epilepsy, learning and behaviour problems
    • Foca dyslasias (heterotopias)
    Abnormalities of laminar structure or abnormally positioned cellsDisorder of migration / multiple organsEpilepsy, learning disability, schizophrenia
    • Double cortex
    Diffuse cortical dysplasia with a band of heterotropic matter between cortex and ventricles. The cerebral surface may look normal.Disorder of migration, late in migration, once some waves of migration are completeAsymptomatic, sometimes epilepsy
    Differentiation   
    • Porencephaly
    Presence of large cystic lesions, usually bilaterally.5 - 7 months of gestation, traumatic cause / vascular / infectionAsymptomatic (sometimes), but also retardation and epilepsy

    Which factors influence brain development?

    Brain development is complex with many different developmental mechanisms occurring both in sequence and simultaneously. In addition, a number of factors can interfere with this process, potentially causing irreversible changes to these developmental processes and to the final outcome. 

    Prenatal risk factors include:

    • Maternal stress and age.
    • Maternal health (such as: history of infection, rubella, AIDS, herpes simplex).
    • Nutrition (diet, malnutrition).
    • Maternal drug and alcohol addiction.
    • Environmental toxins (such as: lead, radiation, trauma).

    Post-natal risk factors include:

    • Birth complications.
    • Nutrition.
    • Environmental toxins (such as: lead, radiation, trauma).
    • Cerebral infection.
    • Environment / experience.
    Access: 
    Public
    What is the influence of early brain insult on cognitive and social development? - Chapter 3

    What is the influence of early brain insult on cognitive and social development? - Chapter 3

    The development of motor and perceptual skills through early childhood is characterised by dramatic progression across cognitive and social domains. The emergence of most functional abilities (such as swallowing, grasping objects, sitting independently, walking independently, running, biking, and (un)dressing independently) cannot be determined accurately as there is considerable variation in the timing of skill acquisition across the normal population. When the developmental process in interrupted by early brain insult, this variability increases even more, so that developmental predictions become even less reliable. 

    What is the difference between the domain-specific models and the domain-general framework?

    In the literature, there is an ongoing debate regarding the mechanisms underlying the maturation of cognitive abilities. Two frameworks are contrasted: domain-specific and domain-general. The domain-specific approach is based on a 'modular' or 'localisationist approach in which individual cognitive skills are considered as developing according to a unique time-table and set of rules. This approach is often applied to language development. In contrast, the domain-general approach is based on the idea that the emergence of cognitive skills follows a more general path, where the development of specific skills is dependent on a series of cognitive processes. This is more in line with the emergence of functional neural networks. Critical to all aspects of cognitive development, according to this framework, are: information processing skills, including attention, processing speed, and memory. 

    A key model within the domain-general framework has been developed by Cowan (1999). It is an integrative systemic model, which is primarily structural, and incorporates components of attention, memory, processing speed, and central executive (directing the focus of attention and formulating strategies for efficient performance). According to this model, the individual must first attend to information, register and encode it, and then store it in memory. All these aspects of processing have limited speed and capacity. Across each of these steps are connections. Consequently, limitations in development of any of these components will reduce the efficiency of the system as a whole. 

    Which attentional components are commonly reported in the literature? 

    Attentional skills are critical for the development of neurocognitive systems, which subsequently influence adaptive, social, and academic functioning of children. Impairment of attentional skills may yield that children are less able to learn and acquire skills from their environment in order to function independently in daily life and make use of both formal instruction and incidental environmental learning. It is therefore important to accurately map the attentional profile of children, as this may enable the implementation of appropriate and accurately targeted interventions. 

    Attention is represented an integrative neural system, which involves contributions from various structures including the brain stem, reticular activating system, and posterior and anterior cerebral regions. The development of attention is characterised by a systematic increase in the ability of the child to override innate response tendencies and replacing these with more appropriate ones in situations where is it beneficial to do so.

    Some of the earliest proposed models are the model by Alexander Luria (1973), who proposed two attentional systems operating within the brain, and Posner (1978) who proposed a dual-system model of attention, also suggesting two components to attentional processing; one in the posterior cerebral cortex and a second, higher-order system, in the anterior brain regions. 

    Based on this seminal early work, current models of attention describe an integrated system consisting of a number of separate but increasing components. Each component is subsumed by a particular cerebral region underpinned by an attentional brain network. Disruptions to this system will result in deficits in one or more aspects of attention. Although there is not universal agreement of these components, the following attentional components are commonly reported in the literature:

    • Vigilance (arousal): sustained attention or the ability to keep attention over time.
    • Selective attention: the ability to target attentional resources to a specific task, thereby filtering out distracting stimuli, or to detect relevant stimuli and create motor responses in the context of background distraction.
    • Attentional control: comprising inhibition (the ability to intentionally suppress a dominant, automatic, or prepotent response), self-regulation and monitoring (the ability to manage one's own thoughts, feelings, and actions in adaptive and flexible ways across a variety of different contexts). Attentional control mainly refers to shifting attention (the ability to shift attentional focus) and dividing attention (the ability to simultaneously attend to two tasks or stimuli), as these require flexibility and higher-order skills that are consistent with more executive attention processes. 

    Disruptions of attentional development can be seen in a range of neurodevelopmental disorders, such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorder ASD) and Tourette's syndrome. There are large differences in the nature of attention deficits across these groups, perhaps due to different underlying cerebral pathology or possibly due to different timing of onset of the condition. 

    What are the effects of impaired memory development? 

    Different models have been developed to explain the process by which information is registered, encoded, stored, and retrieved. Although these models vary greatly, there is some consistency with respect to the major components described in these models:

    • Sensory store: where information enters the system via the sensory organs and is briefly held.
    • Short-term memory, long-term memory, and working memory: although models incorporating these structures are less consistent, they generally incorporate notions of encoding and analysis, which involve active processes such as rehearsal and chunking.
    • Central executive: taking a managerial role in directing voluntary attention and enabling voluntary retrieval and activation of stored information. 

    The development of memory skills begins already at birth. Research has shown that newborns already exhibit habituation to familiar stimuli; memory for the familiar stimulus. Advances in memory function are clearly documented throughout childhood, although -not surprisingly- there is variation among individuals in the developmental trajectories. Generally, recognition skills are first acquired, followed by immediate memory capacity (measured by the number of digits or letters a child can remember at a time), recall and repetition. 

    The development of memory is particularly vulnerable to interference following early cerebral insult. The earlier such insult occurs, the higher the degree and generalisation of the problem. Memory impairment occurring during childhood interferes with the efficient acquisition and consolidation of most or sometimes all knowledge and skills, limiting the potential development of the child. These problems are commonly manifested by poor educational progress and difficulties in learning social rules. 

    How does impaired processing speed affect cognitive and social development?

    Processing speed is the rate at which information is transmitted throughout the information processing system. Processing speed is a reflection of the efficiency of the overall system. Generally, processing speed increases as children become older. Impaired processing speed may have wide-ranging implications for children. They will be unable to keep up with peers in various circumstances. For example, if speech input or output speed is slowed, the child may appear dysfluent and experience difficulties in (general) conversations. A slowed motor output may restrict the child within the classroom, failing to complete tasks within the set time limit. Slowed responses may limit the capacity of the child to participate in sporting and other leisure activities.

    How does impaired executive function affect cognitive and social development?

    Although there is a vast body of literature on executive function (EF), there is little agreement on its exact definition. Executive function can possibly best be seen as a referring to a neurobehavioural managerial role, directing attention, monitoring activity, and coordinating and integrating information and activity. A model proposed by Anderson (2002) considers the following distinct, yet integrated domains underpinning the cognitive and behavioural aspects of executive function: 

    • Cognitive flexibility (divided attention, working memory, conceptual transfer, feedback utilisation).
    • Goal setting (initiative, conceptual reasoning, planning, strategic organisation).
    • Information processing (efficiency, fluency, speed of processing). 
    • Attentional control (selective attention, self-regulation, self-monitoring, inhibition).

    Development of executive skills emerges in infancy and continues throughout early adulthood. Different components of executive function develop at different rates. These different developmental trajectories are largely determined by the maturation of particular brain structures that underpinning the particular process and the improved interconnectivity of brain regions that form the executive neural system. 

    Impairment in the development of executive function, also known as executive dysfunction, has been consistently reported in children with developmental and acquired conditions, such as traumatic brain injury, low birth weight, congenital brain disorders, and phenylketonuria. Although the identification and documentation of executive (dis)function is possible, it is more difficult to determine the neural causes. As executive function is reliant on lower-order skills, it is important to first identify any deficits in these abilities before attributing the cause of impaired test performance to pure executive impairment.

    How do impaired social skills influence social and cognitive development? 

    Social skills, or social competence, is a term that is used to refer to a range of components:

    • Social competence: the ability to achieve personal goals in social interaction while simultaneously maintaining positive relationships with others over time and across different situations.
    • Social interaction: the ability to modify social actions and reactions between individuals and groups to the interaction partner(s).
    • Social adjustment: the capacity to adapt to the demands of the social environment.

    The development of social skills emerges gradually throughout childhood and adolescence as the result of a dynamic interplay between the individual and the environment. New-borns already are sensitive to facial stimuli, for instance direct gaze, upright faces, and straight heads. Around two to three months, infants demonstrate social initiatives and preferences in processing and recognition of visual and auditory stimuli.

    Social functioning requires the efficient working of an intricate neural system. Impaired social skills (mainly observed by damage to the prefrontal cortex and the orbitofrontal cortex) can cause psychological distress, social isolation, and reduced self-esteem. Each of these can have major implications for the quality of life. 

    Access: 
    Public
    What is currently known about recovery from early brain insult? - Chapter 4

    What is currently known about recovery from early brain insult? - Chapter 4

    Recovery from early brain insult has been studied for a long time with studies dating back to the 1920s. However, recovery from early brain insult still remains imperfectly understood. Brain insults that almost certainly would result in severe cognitive dysfunction in an adult brain, appear to have rather different consequences for a developing brain. The aim of this chapter is to examine current understandings of outcomes from early brain insult. In doing so, the concepts of vulnerability and plasticity will be discussed and considered as opposite extremes along a recovery continuum. Where the recovery of an individual child falls along this continuum will depend upon a number of factors, including:

    • Injury-related factors (nature of the lesion, severity, timing of insult).
    • Constitutional factors (developmental stage, cognitive capacity, genes, gender).
    • Environmental factors (family function, social status, access to rehabilitation and interventions).

    Although these factors may independently impact recovery from early brain insult, it is more likely that they will interact dynamically, yielding a wide spectrum of outcomes observed in children post-early brain insult.

    How are brain plasticity and vulnerability related to recovery from early brain insult?

    Brain plasticity refers to the capacity of the brain to respond dynamically in response to the environment and experience, through modification to neural circuitry. A further distinction can be made between neural plasticity (the brain's response to the environment; referring to physiological processes at molecular, cellular, neuro chemical, and neuroanatomical levels) and functional plasticity (behavioural change of recovery). Neural recovery may not necessarily lead to functional recovery. Brain plasticity is not specific to the immature brain, and also occurs in a mature brain. Plasticity is a beneficial concept in the context of healthy development, because it facilitates adaptive change in response to environmental stimuli. 

    The influence of brain plasticity after brain insult is less well established. Although there may be an opportunity to take advantage of the lack of functional specificity in the immature brain (for example via transfer of functions from damaged to undamaged areas), the brain's capacity for plasticity may also reflect vulnerability with predetermined developmental processes being derailed, neural resources depleted, and an absence of a developmental 'blueprint' to guide recovery. 

    Two explanations for the differential susceptibility theory

    There is a lot of variability in outcome from early brain insult, which is in agreement with the differential susceptibility theory. Although children may demonstrate great capacity for plasticity, they can also demonstrate poor recovery. Two contradictory explanations have been proposed for these seeming inconsistencies:

    1. Early plasticity: the immature brain possesses great flexibility, which facilitates good recovery and outcome.
    2. Early vulnerability: the immature brain in uniquely susceptible, with early brain insult leading to incomplete recovery and poor outcome. 

    Both views agree that infancy and childhood are developmental stages that are associated with unique responses to brain injury. Both suggest a mainly lineair relationship between age at brain insult and functional outcome. However, they differ drastically with regard to the interpretation of the direction of this relationship. A central concern in this debate is whether specific brain functions are innately specialised to specific brain regions or whether the brain is equipotential (with minimal functional localisation early, hence facilitating healthy brain tissue to adopt functions that were previously the responsibility of the damaged areas). A compromise between these two is offered by interactive specialisation, where brain development is characterised by increasing specialisation or fine-tuning of responses. These responses are specific to brain regions, yet they are changing as they interact and compete to acquire their roles. 

    Neurobehavioral recovery from early brain insult: what is the evidence?

    Evidence of neurobehavioral recovery from early brain insult derives from various research methods such as human research and animal research. Yet, animal research has been and continues to be of particular influence, having the advantage of being able to control for confounding factors such as lesion size and location, age at lesion, and environment. A common finding in animal research is the Kennard principle, demonstrating that early lesions lead to better outcomes than similar lesions in adulthood. Although human research has demonstrate some good recovery outcomes, the identified relative advantages and disadvantages of early brain plasticity are plagued by methodological flaws, which likely explain some of the inconsistencies in reported findings. 

    Which mechanisms underpin recovery? 

    Recovery mechanisms can be divided into two general classes:

    1. Restitution: as the damaged brain recovers, neural pathways are reactivated and functions are restored. 
    2. Substitution: recovery occurs via transfer and reorganisation of functions from damaged brain tissue to healthy sites. 

    Restitution

    One of the best-established theories of restitution is the one of diaschisis, which refers to the period (acute phase) of rapid recovery of function immediately following brain insult. Research has demonstrated that in humans, damaged cell bodies cannot be replaced and damaged axons show slow and minimal growth. Regeneration processes are highly localised at best and often hindered by scar tissue and blood clots. On the other hand, some neural components have the capacity for sprouting or reinervation by locating a new cell 'target' and reconnecting to functional systems. Another mechanism for restoration of function is denervation supersensitivity: a process whereby post-synaptic cells that are deprived of synaptic input, will develop sensitivity to any neurotransmitter substance leaking from pre-lesion neurons via the emergence of new receptors and a larger surface area. Hence, supersensitivity facilitates activation of post-lesion pathways and restitution of normal functioning. Lastly, restitution of molecular genetic process may occur via protein phosphorylation (neural activity is modulated via regulation of ion channels and neurotransmitter receptions, signal transduction pathways, neurotransmitter synthesis) and regulation of gene expression (producing quantitative and qualitative changes in protein components of neurons, such as modifications of the frequency and nature of ion channels and receptors of the cell membrane). 

    Substitution

    Substitution of function is largely supported by indirect evidence, such as behavioural data and functional imaging of change in the injured brain. There are a number of possible scenarios for functional reorganisation:

    1. Interhemispheric reorganisation: functions are considered to transfer to analogous sites in the non-damaged hemisphere.
    2. Intrahemispheric reorganisation: functions are reorganised within the damaged hemisphere.
    3. Intrahemispheric maintenance: skills subsumed by damaged tissue are maintained by that tissue, resulting in maximum dysfunction. This is associated with the poorest outcome. It is thought to occur following bilateral or diffuse insults where little healthy brain tissue is available to support reorganisation. 

    Which factors influence recovery following early brain insult?

    Consider again the recovery continuum in which early plasticity and early vulnerability are not seen as opposing views, but rather represent extremes along a continuum. Where an individual falls on this continuum after early brain insult, depends on multiple factors:

    • Injury-related factors: nature, extent, and site of insult:
      • The influence of the extent of a lesion on outcome can be best represented by a U-shaped curve, with small and large lesions leading to better outcomes than intermediate lesions. As expected, small lesions appear most sensitive to plasticity and are consistently associated with good recovery. Interestingly, large, unilateral lesions, may yield such extensive damage, that they force interhemispheric transfer of function, yielding minimal impact on functional abilities. 
      • The worst recovery is documented for early brain insult which is diffuse or bilateral, where greater lesion volume is associated with worse impairment.
      • In contrast to adult findings, there is little evidence for a relationship between brain lesion site and outcome.  
    • Age / developmental level at time of brain insult: 
      • There is a complex and non-linear relationship between age at insult and recovery. There is evidence that this relationship is not linear, in particular in early adulthood where rapid, stepwise changes are occurring within the brain. 
    • Sex:
      • Girls generally demonstrate a higher development rate of the brain throughout childhood. Grey matter volume peaks at around age 10 in girls, whereas it is above age 12 in boys. Girls also demonstrate greater dendritic volume and more bilateral activation. If female brain are more diffusely organised and have a greater capacity for functional transfer, there ma be greater potential for plasticity and reorganisation of function. 
    • Environment and experience:
      • Enriching environments are important for optimal development. Environmental factors have been identified as crucial for recovery from early brain insult.
    • Time since testing:
      • Important due to: (i) the rapid recovery that occurs post insult; and (ii) the potential for children with early brain insult to struggle to keep pace with their peers. Children may demonstrate impairments that will recover with time (delayed development) or one may fail to identify impairments in skills that are yet to develop (emerging deficits).
    Access: 
    Public
    How do genetic and metabolic disorders differ from traumatic brain injury? - Chapter 5

    How do genetic and metabolic disorders differ from traumatic brain injury? - Chapter 5

    Metabolic and endocrine disorders are challenging for clinical neuropsychologists. They are encountered less frequently in routine clinical practice and have received less attention in research than more frequently encountered conditions, such as traumatic brain injury. Hence, the knowledge base to guide clinical assessment is less complete. Genetic and metabolic disorders differ from traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the sense that they involve a potential for ongoing CNS insult across neurodevelopment. In addition, whereas the timing of TBI is easily known, the timing of putative insults is often unknown. Genetic and metabolic disorders are life-long conditions, although treatment demands vary across the conditions. The potential impact of an insult varies depending on the stage of neurodevelopmental at which it occurs. Some disorders, like galactasaemia, invariably demonstrate symptoms from birth onward, whereas for example individuals with Wilson's disease usually become symptomatic in the second and third decades of life.  In this chapter, common genetic and metabolic disorders (Klinefelter syndrome, galactasaemia, Wilson's disease, and type 1 diabetes) will be discussed.

    What are the characteristics of Klinefelter syndrome?

    Epidemiology

    Klinefelter syndrome (KS) is the most common sex chromosome aneuploidy in humans with an incidence of 1 in every 400-500 male births. It is characterised by an extra X chromosome in one or more cells resulting in a 47, XXY karyotype. Physical symptoms of KS are: tall stature, reduced endogenous testosterone production, hypogonadism, and fertility problems. During puberty, the following characteristics manifest themselves: small testes, breast enlargement, reduce body and facial hair, heavier and less muscular bodies. The clinical phenotype of KS is highly variable and it is estimated that approximately two-thirds of those with KS are never diagnoses, despite evidence that early identification affects physiological, reproductive and possibly neurodevelopmental outcomes.

    Neuropsychological findings

    Various neuroanatomical correlates of KS have been documented: reduced total grey matter (GM) and white matter (WM) volumes, compensatory increase in ventricular size, regional changes (reduced GM volumes in bilateral amygdala, hippocampus, insula and temporal lobes, inferior frontal lobes and cerebellum, while other regions are increased, such as sensorimotor and parietal-occipatal GM). 

    Functional outcomes

    Although there is a lot of variability, IQ is on average lower in individuals with KS with verbal IQ typically lower than performance IQ. A common finding in research is elevated rates of language deficits in individuals with KS. Further, delays in fine and gross motor skills are found, including problems with dexterity, speed, coordination and strength, as well as impaired visuo-graphic skills. Between 60 and 80% of individuals with a clinical diagnosis of KS function below grade level and require special educational resources, usually for a language-based learning difficulty. 

    It is expected that the clinical phenotype of KS (how it manifests itself) is influenced by environmental, genetic, and hormonal factors. For example, researchers showed that there is a strong, positive effect of environmental advantage showing an above average score on IQ (110) in a high SES sample, despite the usual motor and language delays and physical features of KS. 

    Treatment

    The standard treatment (currently the only available medical treatment) for KS is testosterone replacement, which is associated with reduced fatigue, increased libido, and improved mood and concentration. Yet, it has little effect on fertility. 

    What are the characteristics of galactasaemia?

    Epidemiology

    Galactasaemia (GAL) is an autosomal recessive disorder of carbohydrate metabolism that is caused by a deficiency of the enzyme galactose-1-phosphate uridyltransferase (GALT) which converts galactose-1-phosphate to glucose-1-phosphate. In the absence of GALT, galactose metabolites accumulate in tissues, causing direct damage to vulnerable neurons and/or white matter in utero, prior to or even while following treatment. Although GAL has a low incidence (between 1 in every 35,000 - 60,000 children), it is one of the most common inherited metabolic disorders. 

    Symptoms and manifestations of GAL are:

    • Delayed early expressive language and speech milestones.
    • Increased risk for attention deficit without hyperactivity in primary school.
    • Deterioration in academic performance in transition from primary to high school.
    • Arithmetic difficulties at all ages.
    • Left-handedness.
    • Difficulties with complex language processing, such as understanding oral language.
    • Decreased gross motor skills and strength.
    • Communication diagnosis.
    • Pubertal delay.
    • Anxiety, depression, psychosis.
    • Adherence to medical treatments. 

    Interventions

    Some interventions to consider are: early speech and language evaluation, classroom accommodations, avoiding distractions at home during homework, medication, retesting academic performance prior to detect areas requiring extra attention (promoting educational continuity), writing and sports accommodations, physical and occupational therapy, emotional support, addressing isolations and shame through peer support (group psychotherapy), psychological treatment and teaching compliance strategies.

    Neuropathology

    Cerebral and cerebellar atrophy and white matter abnormalities have been identified in patients with GAL. Due to GAL, early development is delayed and IQ is affected. Studies have consistently identified borderline / low average IQ. In addition, speech and language deficits are common in individuals with GAL, as well as motor deficits (including ataxia, tremor, reduced hand strength and impaired manual dexterity and balance). Moreover, visuo-motor and visuo-perceptual skills are impaired. Not surprisingly, academic difficulties are identified in individuals with GAL and there is some evidence that learning difficulties increase with age. 

    Treatment

    Based on the hypothesis that defective galactosylation of complex macro-molecules such as myelin is due to a deficiency of uridine diphosphate galactose, pharmacological interventions have included trials of uridine supplementation. However, they failed to demonstrate a beneficial effect of cognition. Currently, medical interventions are focused on manipulations regarding the severity and timing of dietary restrictions. Cognitive interventions nowadays focus on language, yet demonstrating inconsistent findings. Some studies found beneficial effects of early speech therapy, whereas others found that the language difficulties are often treatment resistant. Gubbels and colleagues suggested that social skill training in combination with speech therapy may yield positive outcomes, but the efficiency of this approach has not been tested empirically yet. A broader focus on all areas of deficit based on individualised and comprehensive neuropsychological assessment may inform more targeted and effective interventions in the future.

    What are the characteristics of Wilson's disease?

    Epidemiology

    Wilson's disease (WD) is an autosomal recessive disorder characterised by a defective biliary excretion of copper. Copper accumulates in body organs, in particular in the liver, kidney, eyes, and brain, causing oxidative stress, damaging mitochondria, and apoptotic cell death in the affected organs. Accumulation usually starts in the basal ganglia, but as the disease progresses, widespread neuronal loss can be observed in the brainstem, cerebellum, midbrain corpus callosum, and sometimes the cortex. WD is caused by a mutation in the copper-transporting ATP7B gene, which is located on chromosome 13q14.3. WD is more common in Sicily, southern Italy, and eastern Europe than in other countries. WD is a rare disorder affecting approximately 1 in every 30,000- 40,000 individuals although there are many more carriers (estimated to be as high as 1 in 90). Although WD is already present at birth, the diagnosis is commonly made later, when copper toxicity has built up to a degree that causes symptoms, usually between 15 and 21 years. Initial symptoms are liver disease and non-specific neurological or non-specific physiological symptoms, which makes accurate and timely identification of WD a challenging task.

    Treatment and prognosis

    WD is fatal, if it is not treated. The commonly recommended therapy is a diet, restricting copper-rich foods such as chocolate, nuts, shellfish, and liver. Untreated WD may cause subcortical dementia with prominent features of slowness, executive dysfunction, apathy, and depression. The most compromised area of cognitive functioning in WD is executive functions. Many studies have shown significantly impaired scores on tests of, for instance, digit span, verbal fluency, and encoding memory. Further, psychiatric symptoms are common in WD.

    To date, there are no published reports of academic outcomes in WD. This may be due to the fact that, until recently, diagnosis has only occurred towards the end of or after formal schooling has been completed. Nowadays, earlier diagnosis is becoming increasingly common due to the availability of molecular testing, neonatal screening programmes in high-risk populations, and increasing clinical awareness of the symptoms and clinical manifestations of WD.  

    What are the characteristics of type 1 diabetes?

    Epidemiology

    Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a chronic disorder of glucose metabolism, which commonly begins in childhood. It s one of the most common chronic diseases in childhood with the highest incidence in people of European descent at around 1.7 in every 1,000. The beta cells of the pancreas are destroyed in an autoimmune process, leading to an absolute and lifelong loss of insulin production. Insulin is a hormone required for the synthesis of glucose. A constant supply of glucose to the brain is crucial for normal cerebral metabolism. Insulin deficiency, which occurs in T1D, has downstream effects on carbohydrate, lipid, and amino acid metabolism. The brain is one of the major organ systems that is affected by T1D. 

    Treatment

    Treatment of T1D is complex, involving the administration of exogenous insulin by injection or subcutaneous pump, in combination with careful daily monitoring of dietary intake and exercise in an attempt to maintain blood glucose levels within an acceptable euglycaemic range. Although medical treatments are still in its infancy, there is a large body of studies showing that psychological interventions in T1D yield significant reduction in psychological distress as well as a marginally positive effect on metabolic control. Further, standardised interventions with a theoretical basis were more effective than a-theoretical ad hoc programmes. In addition, there is no evidence of a positive benefit in adults with T1D, which suggests that intervention in childhood is crucial. A case study that is described in this book resulted in the following intervention recommendations: improved metabolic control (primary focus of the intervention), proactive mental health support, educational support (such as a quiet and distraction-free working environment, as well as reduced demands on working memory), and strengthening peer relationships. 

    Neuropsychological findings and functional outcomes

    There is a slight decrease in IQ found in T1D patients. That is, IQ scores are consistently within the average range, but lower than those of age-matched healthy controls. Studies demonstrate inconsistent findings regarding the influence of sex, as well as the association between disease variables and neurodevelopmental variables. In summary, studies found many functional implications of T1D regarding cognition, academic achievement, adaptive functions, and psychopathology, depression, eating and other affective disorders. 

    Access: 
    Public
    What is the relationship between brain dysmorphology and functional outcomes? - Chapter 6

    What is the relationship between brain dysmorphology and functional outcomes? - Chapter 6

    During gestation, the immature brain is very vulnerable. Genetic influences and other biological and environmental risk factors contribute to structural changes and functional reorganisation of the brain in utero as well as early post-natal life, which in turn affect all subsequent neurodevelopmental processes. Even small variations in brain structure and neural organisation can, over time, lead to significant changes in cognitive functioning, academic achievement, and adaptive skills. Disorders of the CNS, such as early-onset-hydrochephalus (HYD), and structural disorders of embryogenesis, such as agenesis of the corpus callosum (CC) and non-syndromal craniosynostosis, give a unique opportunity to examine relationships between brain dysmorphology and functional outcomes. The relationship between biological risk and functional outcome is moderated by the compensatory effects of brain plasticity and other distal factors, such as the timing and adequacy of treatment, access to early intervention, family resources, and time of assessment. Hence, early occurring brain insults that occur in structural brain disorders are not single events. Instead, they form a complex set of processes and potential secondary insults or protective influences that together determine the outcomes. 

    What are the characteristics of hydrocephalus?

    Epidemiology

    Hydrocephalus (HYD) refers to a disturbance of the formation, flow or absorption of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), that is secondary to some other pathological event or structural brain anomaly. To put it differently, HYD is the final common pathway of several neurodevelopmental disorders or peri- or post-natal events, rather than a disease entity in itself. HYD occurs in around one case per 1000 births. CSF can be seen as a protection mechanism; it protects the cortex from injury, provides a barrier between brain and blood, and plays a role in the removal of waste products from the CNS. HYD manifests itself in infants by enlargement of the head at an abnormal rate, resulting in a bulging anterior fontanelle and downward deviation of the eyes, also called sunset gaze. Other symptoms are: irritability, lethargy, poor feeding, headaches, vomiting, declining school performance, motor incoordination and incontinence. Yet, some infants are surprisingly asymptomatic. Further, HYD is associated with visuo-perceptual and visuo-motor deficits. This can be explained by the neuropathological correlates of HYD: as the ventricles enlarge, optic nerves may be damaged, resulting in a high incidence of ophthalmic abnormalities. Another consistent finding in children with HYD concerns deficits in focused and selective attention, in particular in those skills that are dependent upon the arousal activation attention systems (orientation, focus, and shift) mediated by the midbrain and posterior attention system. Children with HYD manifest high rates of learning difficulties that persist into adolescence, as well as limited occupational choice and impaired quality of life in adulthood. 

    Aetiology 

    There are multiple causes of HYD. There is a comprehensive list of 73 causes of HYD, such as agenesis of the corpus callosum, brainstem glioma, achondroplasia, haemorrhage, and congenital syphilis. These 73 causes are subdivided into the following categories:

    1. congenital malformations;
    2. infectious causes;
    3. traumatic causes;
    4. neoplasms;
    5. syndromes;
    6. vascular causes; 
    7. syndromes.  

    Classification

    There are different ways to classify HYD; it can be classified according to type (obstructive or communicating), aetiology (congenital or acquired) and/or the presence of comorbidities. Obstructive HYD occurs when there is a barrier to the CSF flow, either within the ventricles or cerebral aqueduct or at the outlet of the fourth ventricle, preventing free flow of CSF between the ventricles and the subarachnoid space. Communicating HYD occurs when there is free flow of the CSF within the ventricular system, but the absorption of CSF is disrupted within the subarachnoid space. Congenital forms of HYD are usually of the obstructive type and occur in disorders of embryogenesis, such as spina bifida, Arnold-Chiari malformations, aqueduct stenosis (AS), and the Dandy-Walker syndrome (DWS). Approximately 55-70% of all cases of HYD are congenital. 

    Treatment

    Progressive HYD is treated by surgery with insertion of a mechanical shunt, typically into one of the lateral ventricles that drains excess CSF into another body space, commonly the peritoneal cavity. Shunting has played an important role in reducing the mortality and morbidity that has been associated with HYD, although shunts may block periodically, requiring surgical revision, with each procedure being associated with risk of haemorrhage and infection. Unlike many forms of CNS disorder, children who are successfully treated (excluding those with comorbid spina bifida myelomeningocele (SMB) or comorbid cerebral palsy) may have no evidence of physical disability or permanent neurological signs or symptoms and may not need ongoing treatment or medication. 

    What are the characteristics of agenesis of the corpus callosum?

    Epidemiology

    Agenesis of the corpus callosum is a birth defect in which there is complete or partial absence of the corpus callosum. The prevalence is 18 in every 10,000 live births, with higher rates associated with PT birth, higher maternal age, and in children with developmental delay. In healthy embryrogenesis, formation of the corpus callosum occurs prenatally from 11 to 15 weeks' gestational age. Disruptions during embryogenesis may result in either complete absence or agenesis of the CC (AgCC) or partial forms of the anomaly. Because the development of the corpus callosum is caudally (with the genu forming first, followed by the body, splenium, and rostrum), partial defects always involve the posterior segments of the CC. 

    Corpus callosum

    The corpus callosum (CC) is the largest cerebral commissure in the brain, spanning much of the frontal and parietal lobes from the anterior commissure to the hippocampal commissure posteriorly. The CC offers neuronal connections between the two hemispheres of the human brain in order to facilitate transfer of information and to coordinate activity between contralateral areas. The CC can be divided in three components: (i) the genu or anterior part that connects frontal and premotor brain regions across the hemispheres; (ii) a middle section or body that connects motor, somatosensory, and parietal areas; and; (iii) the splenium or posterior section that connects homotopic areas of the temporal and occipital cortices. 

    Comorbidities

    AgCC may occur as an isolated condition, but is also associated with other disorders of the central nervous system, including malformations of cortical development such as SBM, DWS, interhemispheric cyst, neurofibromatosis type 1, and macro- or micro-cephaly. AgCC is also associated with higher rates of malformations in other organ systems, such as eyes, kidney, and hart. Another common comorbidity of AgCC is epilepsy. Commonly noted behavioural and social difficulties that have been observed in children with AgCC are labile mood and conduct problems. Several researchers have drawn attention to an overlap between the social deficits manifested in AgCC and those evident in neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and Tourette syndrome (TS). Given the heterogeneous nature of AgCC in terms of comorbidities, clinical symptoms, and neuropathological findings, and the methodological limitations of present research (in particular small samples, many single-case reports), it is not surprising that there has not yet been identified a characteristic neuropsychological profile. 

    What are the characteristics of craniosynostosis?

    Epidemiology

    Craniosynostosis refers to a premature fusion of one or more of the sutures that normally separate the bony plates of the skull to accommodate rapid brain growth during early development of the brain. It affects around 1 in every 2000 children. Fusion of multiple sutures usually occurs in genetic disorders such as Apert, Crouson, Pfeiffer, and Carpenter syndromes, and typically involves elevated rates of intellectual disability. In this chapter, however, the focus is on single-suture craniosynostosis (SSC) which involves isolated, non-syndromic fusions of the sagittal, coronal, metopic, or lambdoid sutures. Skull phenotype is dependent upon the particular suture that is fused. 

    • Sagittal synostosis hinders lateral (bi-temporal) growth of the skull, redirecting brain growth towards the frontal and occipital lobes; this condition is also known as scaphocephaly
    • Coronal synostosis comprises forward growth of the anterior cranial vault and may yield a hypoplastic frontal lobe on the affected side, with compensatory prominence of the frontal bone on the unaffected side; this condition is also known as anterior plagiocephaly
    • Metopic synostosis hinders growth of the frontal cranial vault with compensatory increased parietal and occipatal width, producing a triangular head shape; this condition is also known as trigonocephaly.
    • Lambdoid synostosis is characterised by flattening of the occipital and parietal regions of the unaffected side, causing posterior plagiocephaly. 

    Sagittal synostosis is the most common form of the condition, accounting for approximately half of the total number of cases, followed by coronal (20-29%), metopic (20%), and lambdoid (2-4%) synostosis. 

    Neuropsychological findings

    Despite IQ usually being within the average range, SSC is associated with a range of more subtle neurodevelopmental problems, reported in 25-50% of children with SSC. Commonly reported problems are persisting speech and language impairments, as well as deficits in memory, learning, attention, and executive skills. The commonly reported language deficits in SSD may be attributed to reduced short-term auditory memory capacity compromising early acquisition of both receptive and expressive language skills. In addition, a range of functional difficulties have been identified in children with SSC, including academic difficulties (repeated grades, increased need for remedial support, difficulties in math, but in particular impaired literacy and writing difficulties) and behavioural difficulties, as shown by elevated scores in the clinical range of the Internalising and Externalising scales of the Child Behavior Checklist (CLC) at age 3. Important contributors to outcome are: family resources, SES, family functioning, and parental mental health. Research has found high levels of stress and poor mother-child bonding in infants with early medical problems.

    Treatment

    In addition to medical interventions, early intervention should support parenting practices that encourage autonomy and explorative and contingent play, while organisational tools may compensate for executive deficits. In addition, social skills training may be helpful to approve appreciation of peri-personal space and to foster a capacity for intimacy, appropriate self-disclosure, and empathic listening skills, as well as to encourage opportunities for peer interactions. For the interventions for children with structural brain disorders the following twelve key issues have been listed:

    1. Follow normal progressions in cognitive development, that is from surface to depth, from concrete to more abstract.
    2. Build a knowledge base by aiding the child to acquire meaningful new content.
    3. Target the efficiency of cognitive processes.
    4. Teach organising strategies to increase memory capacity in real-life settings, until they become habituated.
    5. Use an approach that is balanced among targeted cognitive activities, compensation strategies, and environmental structuring, based on the short- and long-term goals of the child.
    6. Support generalisation of new learning to real life situations.
    7. Provide services in a meaningful context to support daily living, school, social, vocational, and leisure goals.
    8. Consider the role of motivation and executive functioning and actively teach strategies to enhance performance as well as learning.
    9. Integrate and organise training activities over time and avoid setting multiple goals simultaneously.
    10. Teach adults that are involved with the child to be cognitive coaches and to engage in effective behaviour management.
    11. Provide a high level of support initially and reduce it as the child consolidates necessary skills.
    12. Teach adults the links between cognitive impairment and behavioural problems in children with brain insults.
    Access: 
    Public
    How does the study of common perinatal brain insults facilitate knowledge about the principles of post-natal neural development? - Chapter 7

    How does the study of common perinatal brain insults facilitate knowledge about the principles of post-natal neural development? - Chapter 7

    Perinatal brain insults are brain insults that occur between 28 weeks of gestation to 28 days after birth. Common perinatal brain insults, which are discussed in this chapter, are preterm (PT) birth, hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE) and perinatal stroke (PS). These perinatal insults provide a unique opportunity to study the fundamental principles of post-natal neural development. In addition, they facilitate a more nuanced understanding of the dichotomy early plasticity versus greater vulnerability. Current evidence suggests that there are both possibilities and restrictions in the degree to which early brain injury becomes integrated into the ongoing dynamic and adaptive processes of neurodevelopment. 

    What are the characteristics of preterm birth?

    Epidemiology

    Preterm birth (PT) refers to the delivery of a live foetus prior to 37 weeks of completed gestation. PT can be subdivided into late PT (LPT) for deliveries prior to 37 weeks, very PT (VPT) for deliveries prior to 32 weeks, and extremely PT (EPT) for deliveries prior to 28 weeks. Another subdivision can be made according to weight with weight below 2500 grams, 1500 grams, and 1000 grams, considered low birth weight (LBW), very low birth weight (VLBW)and extremely low birth weight (ELBW) respectively. Birth weight and gestation duration are considered to be correlated, but not interchangeable. Classification by gestational age is preferred, because it provides a better predictor of the maturation of the organ systems and other developmentally regulated processes that birth weight does. 

    The overall rate of PT birth has increased. Advances in neonatal care, including steroid therapy, ventilator techniques, and surfactant therapy, as well as enhanced nutrition have led to a reduction of mortality, in particular in EPT infants. Despite the overall increase in survival rate, the rates of major disability, including moderate to severe intellectual disability, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, blindness, and sensori-neural deafness, have remained rather constant.

    Aetiology

    There are multiple causes of preterm birth. Some of these factors relate to maternal well-being and others to factors within the infant. Maternal risk factors include age (below 20 or above 35) and maternal obesity, smoking, illicit drug use, heavy alcohol consumption during pregnancy, malignancy, hypertension, pre-eclampsia, intrauterine infection, and placental disorders. In the infant, foetal abnormalities and IUGR may require medical intervention. A quarter of the PT births is caused by early delivery as a planned medical intervention. The remainder occurs spontaneously, many for unknown reasons. A greater risk for PT rupture of membranes is caused by multiple pregnancies, which occur in two to three per cent of all pregnancies and account for approximately 20% of all PT births. 

    Neuropathology

    Due to preterm birth, major organ systems are immature, leaving the infant at risk for medical complications including respiratory difficulties, cardiac problems and infections, as well as brain injury. Although all organ systems are immature in PT infants, the brain is particularly vulnerable. PT birth occurs at a crucial time of rapid brain development (brain size increases fourfold in the third trimester of pregnancy and myelinated white matter increases fivefold in this last trimester). PT birth conveys risk for both acquired brain injury and disruption of normal brain development thereafter. Specific forms of brain injury that follow from PT birth include germinal matrix IVH (GM-IVH) which refers to bleeding in the germinal matrix (a transient structure within the developing brain located along the flow of the lateral ventricles), periventricular haemorrhagic infarction (PHI), cystic PVL, diffuse white matter injury, and grey matter abnormalities. Around 15% of PT survivors is affected by spastic cerebral palsy. Other manifested symptoms are seizure disorders, sensory problems including blindness and sensori-neural deafness, impaired motor deficits, and attention and learning problems at school age.

    Neuropsychological findings

    A range of negative neurodevelopmental outcomes have been documented in PT born children. A large meta-analysis concerning general intelligence revealed a consistent pattern of lower scores in children born PT in comparison to healthy controls. Another study found that 14 to 25% of children born VPT score more than two standard deviations below the mean on IQ tests. In addition, studies have found elevated rates on language delay and language impairment in children born PT, especially those born VPT or EPT. Some researchers have argued that these language difficulties can be explained by global cognitive deficits, while others suggest a more specific impairment affecting both expressive and receptive skills, including phonological processing, grammar, fluency, higher-level comprehension, discourse and pragmatics. Due to the high risk of white matter abnormalities following PT, it is not surprising that information processing skills are affected. Further, a range of attention deficits have been documented, including orientation, shifting, and divided attention, as well as executive control of attentional resources. 

    Functional outcomes 

    Due to the range of cognitive difficulties described in the previous paragraph, it is not surprising that PT birth has a negative affect on academic achievement. There is a linear relationship between degree of prematurity and academic difficulties. Although some studies found greater difficulty in one domain over the other, a recent review suggests more global difficulties, including poorer performance on standardised tests of reading, mathematics, and writing, as well as a higher rate of repeated grades and need for special educational support. A researcher suggested that the triad of attention, memory, and self-regulatory deficits mostly contribute to the learning difficulties as they compromise the capacity of the child to benefit from educational opportunity. Further, the relationship between non-right-handedness and academic outcomes is stronger in children born PT and appears to be mediated by the integrity of the neonatal corpus callosum. 

    PT and subsequent physical separation during hospitalisation pose risks on optimal socio-emotional development of the child. The parent-infant attachment is likely to be affected by parental anxiety about the survival and well-being of their infant. Further, neurological impairment in the infant appears to increase the risk for disorganised or insecure attachment. Other symptoms commonly found are behaviour problems, internalising symptoms, and social difficulties. In addition, an elevated risk for psychiatric disorders is documented, which appears to escalate in adolescence, reflected by increased social isolation, risk aversion, and poorer behavioural self-regulation. A finding specific to the PT population is that of increased attention problems without the presence of comorbid hyperactivity/impulsivity. Moreover, a higher rate of comorbid ASD is documented. 

    Despite improvements in medical management, PT birth still is associated with increased stress levels in families and long-term morbidity in the surviving infants. There appears to be an elevated level of anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress symptoms in mothers of PT infants. Another study found persistent mental health symptoms in both mothers and fathers at six months after the birth of their PT born child. Persisting parental psychopathology in turn is associated with longer-term outcomes for the PT born child, including poorer neurocognitive and academic outcomes at age seven. Longitudinal studies show little proof of 'catching up' with some studies even pointing towards greater functional deficit over time. 

    Treatment

    There is a long history of interventions following PT birth. In general, these interventions tended to be heterogeneous in focus and content, which makes it difficult to evaluate their efficacy. The cornerstone of good clinical management appears to be neuropsychological assessment at key time-points along the developmental pathway. Such assessment should comprise global measures of ability as well as documentation of the specific strengths and weaknesses of the child. Parent and teacher observations should form an integral piece of the assessment. Interventions should be targeted to individual needs as well as family circumstances. Further, attentional, sensory, and motor deficits may confound performance, even when the target skill is intact. Therefore, motor-free and untimed tasks should be included in the assessment procedure where possible and caution is required when interpreting the result to avoid drawing spurious conclusions. 

    What are the characteristics of hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy?

    Epidemiology

    Neonatal encephalopathy (NE) is an umbrella term used to describe compromised neurological functioning in the human infant in the first days of life. A subgroup hereof is hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE), which refers to infants with NE in the context of perinatal asphyxia without other genetic or metabolic syndromes that might induce clinical signs of neurological functioning. HIE occurs in approximately 1 to 6 of 1,000 births. There is a high rate of mortality in HIE (around 10%). HIE is the major cause of neurodevelopmental disability following full-term birth; approximately half of the survivors of severe HIE have substantial long-term neurodevelopmental disabilities, including cerebral palsy, sensori-neural hearing loss, cortical blindness, epilepsy, and cognitive impairment. Children with moderate HIE form the most heterogeneous group in which there is high variability in outcome. There appears to be a dose-response effect of HIE which leads to a continuum of morbidity in this moderate subgroup, that is not well captured by a discrete classification system. 

    Classification

    HIE is usually classified according to a system proposed by Gonzales and Miller (2006). First, the grading of encephalopathy is determined using six signs, each of which is scored 0 if normal and 1 if abnormal. The six encephalopathy signs are:

    1. Alertness (0 = alert).
    2. Tone (0 = normal).
    3. Flexes (0 = normal).
    4. Respiratory status (0 = normal).
    5. Feeding (0 = normal).
    6. Seizures (0 = none).

    Second, there are three clinical stages of encephalopathy. Each stage has a different profile on:

    1. Level of consciousness.
    2. Neuromuscular control.
    3. Complex reflexes.
    4. Autonomic function. 
    5. Seizures. 

    The first stage is characterised by: hyperalert consciousness, normal neuromuscular control, weak complex reflexes, sympathetic autonomic function, and no seizures. The second stage is characterised by: lethargix or obtunded consciousness, mild hypotonia, weak or absent complex reflexes, parasympathetic autonomic function, and common seizures. The third stage is characterised by stuporous level of consciousness, flaccid neuromuscular control, absent complex reflexes, depressed autonomic function, and uncommon seizures.  

    Neuropsychological findings

    Language may be more sensitive to HIE-related brain damage than visual processing skills. One study found that speech and hearing in particular are impaired. Mild HIE is associated with no or only minimal academic difficulties, while moderate and severe HIE is associate a high degree of academic difficulties, noted by deficits in specific skills as well as delayed school readiness, and increased need for special educational support. Academic difficulties are global, extending to both literacy and numeracy skills. In addition, behaviour problems have been found, including anxiety, hyperactivity, attention difficulties, and social problems.

    Treatment

    There is little research documenting psychological interventions tailored to HIE survivors, but there are several medication interventions documented that aim to reduce adverse neurodevelopmental sequelae. Currently, a potential neuroprotective agent, erythropoietin, is being studied in several centers. Yet, evidence of its efficacy in reducing long-term consequences is not yet available. 

    What are the characteristics of perinatal stroke?

    Epidemiology

    Perinatal stroke (PS) refers to conditions where there is focal disruption of cerebral blood flow secondary to a blockage (known as ischaemic stroke), rupture of an artery or vein (known as haemorrhagic stroke, HS) or a cerebral sinovenous thrombosis (CSVT) in the brain during foetal or early post-natal life. The majority (80%) of PS is formed by perinatal arterial ischaemic strokes (PAISs). PAIS is often associated with seizures or other clear signs of acute neurological distress such as lethargy, apnoea, or hypotonia in the early post-natal period. However, delayed diagnosis is common, for instance in the first year of life, when parents note some neurodevelopmental abnormality, typically asymmetrical body movements or seizure activity. PAIS accounts for approximately one quarter of all childhood strokes. Although mortality rates are low (1-3%), morbidity following PS is considerable with approximately 80% of survivors manifesting one or more of the following: cerebral palsy, cognitive impairment, ongoing seizure disorders, and cortical sensory deficits. 

    Several maternal, fetal/neonatal, and environmental risk factors have been identified. These are listed below:

    • Maternal factors: thrombotic state of pregnancy, thrombophilias (acquired or inherited), drug abuse, pre-eclampsia, infection, infertility, fertility treatment, labor and delivery complications.
    • Fetal/neonatal factors: inherited thrombophilias, twin-twin transfusion, infection, perinatal asphyxia, congenital heart disease, hypoglycemia, polyglycemia, cathether-related complications.
    • Environmental risk factors: gender, race, dehydration, antiphospolipid antibodies. 

    Functional outcomes

    PS occurs at a time of dynamic neural organisation. Therefore, there is potential for adaptation and compensatory reorganisation of neural networks. However, functional outcomes are often abnormal and may involve the supposedly intact hemisphere. 

    Generally, IQ scores of PS survivors are within the average range, although the scores are lower than those of comparison or normative samples. One important determinant of IQ is age at assessment, with lower scores found in children who were assessed later (after age 7), leading the researchers of that study to suggest that limits of functional plasticity become apparent as the complexity of task demands increase and exceed the processing capacity of an under-resourced brain. Further, approximately half of the survivors of PS exhibit compromised receptive and expressive language skills. Other studies demonstrated deficits in visual pattern analysis and visual memory, particularly in PS survivors with occipito-temporal lesions. 

    Treatment

    In contrast to previous believes that plasticity in a young brain ensures more favourable outcomes, most studies report poorer outcomes following a perinatal event than after stroke occurring later in adulthood. A recent study described a curvilinear relationship between age of insult and outcome, with children experiencing stroke prior to six months and after six years having the poorest cognitive outcomes. There is not much research and evidence regarding educational and behavioural outcomes in survivors of PS. 

    To date, there is little empirical evidence to guide systematic intervention for children with PS. Treatments to minimise spasticity and to maximise function are conventional physiotherapy and occupational therapy as well as botulinum toxin injections and surgical interventions. In addition, neuroprotective treatments such as caspase inhibitors, erythropoietin, and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation have been proposed to minimise damage to the neonatal brain. While they are attracting growing interest, there is not yet convincing evidence for their efficacy. 

    Conclusion

    To conclude, the brain functions an as integrated and dynamic system. Early injury of the brain affects only the specific location of injury, but also ensures that (sub)cortical neural networks mature in the context of the damaged brain. Skills that are in development of are yet to be acquired are more vulnerable than previously established skills. Hence, the earlier the insult, the greater the potential for cumulative functional deficit. Since perinatal deficits occur by definition very early in life, they provide a unique opportunity to study the possibilities and the limitations of the brains' capacity to reorganise and adapt following such an early insult. To date, research indicates that both vulnerability and plasticity follow perinatal insult. Plasticity is demonstrated, for example, by the fact that children are not aphasic after PS, and most children function within average limits on standardised measures of IQ. Vulnerability, on the other hand, is demonstrated by the subtle deficits in neuropsychological profiles of survivors of PT birth, HIE, and PS, suggesting that reorganisation, in particular during the critical neurodevelopmental stages, may result in inappropriate neural connections, or 'overcrowding' of brain regions, to which function in transferred following early brain injury. 

    Access: 
    Public
    What are the main characteristics of neurodevelopmental disorders? - Chapter 8

    What are the main characteristics of neurodevelopmental disorders? - Chapter 8

    Neurodevelopmental disorders is an umbrella term that is used to describe those conditions that manifest early in life and are characterised by delay or impairment in functions that are associated with the biological maturation of the central nervous system (CNS). Neurodevelopmental disorders comprise a diverse range of conditions, including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), tic disorders such as Tourette syndrome (TS), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), specific language impairment (SLI), developmental coordination disorder (DCD), learning disability (LD), and dyslexia. Neurodevelopmental disorders are life-long conditions, although symptoms may vary over time and even be absent for brief periods of time. Neurodevelopmental disorders are likely to have a strong genetic influence, tend to occur in families with a history of similar or associated disorders. In addition, neurodevelopmental disorders are more common in men than women. Traditionally, neurodevelopmental disorders were considered to result from obstetric complications or birth injury. To date, they are viewed as disorders that reflect the endpoint of a process that starts with a relatively non-specific, genetically influenced disruption to early brain development. It is unlikely that neurodevelopmental disorders result from a single mutant gene. Rather, it is suggested that multiple genes of small effect interact with environmental factors in order to exert probabilistic instead of deterministic effects on later-developing neural systems.

    The remainder of this chapter focuses on the aetiology, neuropathological and neuropsychological correlates, functional outcomes, and interventions for four specific conditions that fall under the umbrella term neurodevelopmental disorders: (1) ADHD; (2) TS; (3) ASD; and (4) SLI. These serve as prototypic examples of neurodevelopmental disorders in general. 

    What are the characteristics of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder?

    Epidemiology

    Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is defined in the DSM-5 as a persistent pattern of inattention and/or hyperactivity - impulsivity that interferes with daily functioning and is inconsistent with developmental expectations. ADHD is the most common neurodevelopmental disorder with an estimated prevalence of 5-10% of all children worldwide. The symptoms have to be present before age 12. In addition, symptoms must occur across two or more settings (for example: school and at home) and impair the quality of academic, social, or occupational activities. Symptoms often persist into adulthood, although the expression of these symptoms may change over time. For example, short play sequences (<3 minutes) in preschool may change to brief activities (< 10 minutes) in primary school, which in turn may change to persistence less than peers in adolescence, which may change to details not completed in adulthood.

    A core feature of ADHD is difficulties in group settings. In addition, during the early school years, learning difficulties become evident, in particular language problems. Core symptoms of ADHD, including inattention, motor restlessness, and executive dysfunction, are likely to play an important role in the underachievement of children with ADHD. Working memory (the capacity to acquire, manipulate, and retain novel information) is strongly associated with academic achievement, and this skill is known to be impaired in children with ADHD. These learning difficulties are often sufficiently severe to require the need to access post-school study and training. In fact, children with ADHD are four to five times more likely to require special educational services in comparison to children without ADHD. Although children with ADHD form a heterogeneous group, they do share features of poor behavioural and emotional self-regulation which is reflected in labile mood, increased irritability, high activity levels, restless and impulsive behaviour, reduced task persistence, oppositionality, aggression, and rule breaking. These problems often emerge early and increase over childhood. They are associated with an elevated risk for accidental injury and self-harm. 

    Classification and diagnosis

    ADHD is divided into three types: inattentive, hyperactivity/impulsivity, and combined. The first type, inattention, manifests itself as difficulty sustaining focus, disorganisation, and a lack of persistence that cannot be explained by oppositionality or lack of comprehension. Children with this type of ADHD typically exhibit educational underachievement, but do not have other psychiatric comorbidities apart from an elevated risk for anxiety disorders. Hyperactivity refers to excessive motor activity (in young children), restlessness and fidgeting (in older children and adults). Impulsivity refers to acting without thinking and lack of regard for negative consequences or danger, as well as social intrusiveness. Both the hyperactive/impulsive and combined type are associated with high comorbidity rates, both with other neurodevelopmental disorders and other psychiatric disorders such as oppositional defiant and conduct disorder and anxiety. 

    The diagnosis of ADHD is thought to be quite controversial. ADHD is diagnosed on the basis of behaviour. To date, no definitive biomarkers for ADHD have been identified, hence the diagnosis is essentially a behavioural one. There is an ongoing debate in the literature whether a pure disorder of ADHD exists, and if it does, whether the different subtypes share the same causality. In addition, early identification of ADHD is problematic, because short attention span and impulsive and hyperactive behaviour is ubiquitous in preschool-aged children. Yet, by the age of four years, behaviour meeting criteria for a diagnosis of ADHD is likely to persist into school age. 

    Comorbidity

    ADHD has a high rate of comorbidity, particularly in boys. ADHD often occurs in the presence of other neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorders, including learning disability (LD), anxiety disorders, motor coordination deficits, oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), and conduct disorder (CD). When both ADHD and ODD are present, ADHD typically precedes ODD. The reverse is very uncommon.

    Due to the high comorbidity of ADHD with intellectual disability (IQ) it is difficult to estimate IQ in ADHD samples. In fact, the DSM-4 specifically excluded a diagnosis of ADHD if the symptoms were better explained by ID. Although this exclusionary criterion has been removed in the DSM-5, it does specify that ADHD in children with an intellectual disability must include symptoms of inattention and hyperactivity that are excessive for their mental age. 

    Aetiology

    The aetiology of ADHD is complex. It is thought to reflect both genetic and environmental factors, as well as their interplay. Several candidate genes have been identified, including the dopamine receptor genes (DRD4, DRD5), the dopamine transporter gene (DAT1), and some genes involved in serotonin transmission (SLC6A4, HTR1B). Similarly, several environmental factors are considered to influence the ADHD phenotype, including: foetal exposure to maternal stress, alcohol, nicotine, and other drugs, low birth weight, preterm birth, and obstetric complications. Post-natal risk factors that have been identified are: post-natal depression, exposure to lead or other neurotoxins, food additives, and psychosocial adversity. Although parenting practices are probably not causal, specific parenting styles (incorporating warm and authoritative parenting) may decrease symptoms in ADHD, while punitive parenting styles may increase symptoms.

    Neuropsychological findings

    Central to the pathophysiology of ADHD are dysregulation of the frontal, subcortical, or cerebellar catecholaminergic circuitry and abnormalities in the dopamine transporter system. Neuroimaging studies have identified reduced whole-brain volumes as well as reductions of approximately 5% in regional volume in the frontal lobes, subcortical brain regions, corpus callosum, and the cerebellum. In addition, functional imaging studies in ADHD revealed reduced activation during response inhibition tasks as well as greater variability in resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (R-fMR) metrics in brain regions similar to those showing reduction in volume, including the prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate, striatum, and cerebellum. 

    Treatment

    The strongest evidence for efficacy in reducing ADHD symptoms is found for stimulant medication, at least in the short term. Psycho-education, parent training, and intensive behaviour therapy are subsequent effective interventions for ADHD after (or in combination with) stimulant medication; these appear to be particularly effective for treating comorbid symptoms of oppositional behaviour and anxiety, as well as for dealing with family conflicts. Tools and adaptions that may be helpful in the school setting are: smaller class sizes, a reduction in classroom distractions, teacher education, modified teacher approaches, and academic schedules with increased opportunity for physical activity. There is less evidence for the efficacy of social skills training or family therapy, although these interventions are potentially helpful for reducing comorbid problems.

    What are the characteristics of Tourette Syndrome?

    Tourette syndrome (TS) is a neurodevelopmental disorder that is characterised by the presence of tics. A tic is a sudden, involuntary, repetitive stereotypic movement (for example: eye blinks, head jerks, facial grimaces) or utterance (for example: throat clearing, complex vocalisations, coprolalia), that mimics some aspect of normal behaviour but occurs out of context and with no environmental precipitant.

    Epidemiology

    TS is the most severe childhood-onset tic disorder and has an estimated prevalence ranging from 1 to 10 per 10,000 children. TS occurs more in boys than in girls (ratio 4.3:1). The earlier tics occur, the more likely that there is a family history involving TS. Symptoms usually manifest between five and seven years of age and are initially spasmodic. Over time (typically between 9 and 12 years), the symptoms become more severe and persistent, causing a high level of distress to both the child and family. Further, motor tics usually appear before vocal tics, who typically appear one or two years later. The ability to suppress tics tends to improve with age, although sufferers report that this effort often impairs concentration (at school) and increases subjective distress and reduces fatigue. Moreover, paradoxically, fatigue and stress tend to increase symptoms, while relaxation, concentration, and physical exercise tend to decline symptoms. The diagnosis TS is given, according to the DSM-5, when both motor and one or more vocal tics are present at some time points. In addition, the tics must persist over a 12-month period and manifest prior to 18 years. In the majority of children with TS, approximately 80%, tics decline in late adolescence. 

    Little is known about the pathogenesis of TS. Several twin studies indicate genetic influences. Yet, the search for specific candidate genes for TS is still in its infancy. Not surprisingly, environmental influences are also likely to contribute. For example, many individuals with TS experience(d) premorbid stress and adverse perinatal events. 

    Neuropsychological findings

    The tics arise from disruptions to the frontal-striatal-thalamocortical circuits that usually subserve self-regulatory capacities, such that the capacity to control sensory urges and motor behaviours is impaired. To put it differently, the tics arise from disruption to the neural circuits that link the prefrontal cortex to the basal ganglia, cerebellum, and back. Dopamine receptors, in particular, are thought to be over-sensitive in TS. Th direct pathway of the cortex to the subthalamic nucleus appears to be a 'hyperactive pathway', in which there is increased activity. Vice versa, the indirect pathway from cortex to subthalamic nucleus (via striatum caudata and putamen, and globus pallidus externa) appears to show a reduced firing rate.

    Neuroimaging studies have identified several neuroanatomical differences in children with TS compared to healthy controls, including abnormal thinning of the sensorimotor and premotor cortices, reduced bilateral caudate volumes, and a 50% reduction in the number and density of GABA-ergic cells in basal ganglia. To compensate, increased volumes have been found in the prefrontal cortex and increased activation in the fronto-striatal circuitry in children who suppress tics and showed fewer symptoms in adulthood. 

    Comorbidity

    TS is known to have a high rate of comorbidity. TS and ADHD occur is approximately 30-50% of all cases and are associated with poorer outcomes than either condition in isolation. Typically, ADHD precedes the emergence of TS. Another comorbid condition is OCD, occurring in approximately one third to half of the children with TS. Some children (estimated prevalence: 22.3%) present a triad of TS, ADHD, and OCD. Estimates of the prevalence of TS and comorbid conditions are given below. 

    • TS only: 40.2%.
    • TS + ADHD: 20.3%.
    • TS + OCD: 17.3%.
    • TS + ADHD + OCD: 22.2.

    Functional outcomes

    The literature is inconsistent regarding IQ in children with TS. Several studies found than children with TS, in particular those without comorbid conditions, had higher than expected IQ scores. However, sampling issues may have contributed to these findings. For example, one of these studies used unmedicated children only, which may suggest that these children only suffered from a mild form of TS and hence not accurately represent the TS population. Other studies, in particular those with comorbid conditions, found lower IQ scores. However, a nuance should be included here. TS and ADHD was found to yield lower IQ scores, while TS and OCD was found to yield higher IQ scores compared to other TS subgroups. Similarly, memory deficits were apparent in TS and ADHD, but not in TS and OCD. To conclude, neuropsychological profiles are very diverse and depend (among others) on specific comorbidities. 

    Children with TS often experience learning difficulties and are more likely to attain special education, in particular if they have comorbid ADHD. Commonly identified difficulties are found in numeracy, sustained attention, writing, and timed activities. Children with TS, regardless of the presence of comorbidities, report lower levels of quality of life. They experience high levels of bullying. Peers often rate them more negatively and perceive them as withdrawn and aggressive. Parents of children with TS often report high levels of distress and emphasise the impact it has on the family. As was said before, tics frequently disappear in late adulthood. Yet, the emotional and social consequences of childhood tics may persist into adulthood.

    Treatment

    Although only few studies have studied the long-term effects of pharmacological and behavioural interventions, there is consensus that psycho-education should be the first aim. Prior to deciding on a specific intervention, a careful assessment for comorbidities in addition to TS must take place. Other interventions that have shown to have some success are habit reversal therapy and other behavioural approaches (CBT), in particular when they are adapted specifically for TS.

    What are the characteristics of Autism Spectrum Disorder?

    Epidemiology

    Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) refers to a heterogeneous spectrum that is characterised by persistent deficits in social communication and reciprocal social interaction (impaired use of non-verbal behaviours, failure to develop peer friendships, little seeking of shared enjoyment of activities, restricted socio-emotional reciprocity), as well as unusual and preoccupying interests (obsessions), rigid adherence to non-functional routines, stereotypic movements, and sensory disturbances. ASD is prevalent in approximately 1-2% of the general population. The increased prevalence of the past decades is likely to be artificial and caused by increased community awareness and changes in diagnostic criteria. ASD is consistently found to occur more in boys than in girls with a ratio of 4:1. 

    Diagnosis

    In earlier editions of the DSM, autism was diagnosed using a subtype approach, distinguishing: Asperger's syndrome, pervasive developmental disorder, and autism spectrum disorder. To date, in the DSM-5, they use an all-encompassing classification, arguing that a spectrum approach is more clinically meaningful, because it better reflects the phenotypic heterogeneity of the disorder. For a DSM-5 diagnosis of ASD, the symptoms as described in the above paragraph must be evident in early life, not better explained by an intellectual disability, and result in significant functional impairment.

    Aetiology

    The aetiology of ASD is not fully understood yet, but twin studies showed that there is a strong genetic contribution involved. Chromosomal abnormalities have been identified in ASD with most consistent evidence for involvement of chromosomes 2q, 7q, and 11q12-13. Yet, findings are far from definitive.

    Comorbidity 

    ASD is a frequently occurring comorbidity in medical conditions, including: fragile X, phenylketonuria, neurofibromatosis, tuberous sclerosis, congenital rubella, seizure disorders, and Down's syndrome. There is also a high comorbidity rate of ASD and ADHD.

    Neuropsychological findings

    Accurate identification of the underlying pathogenesis of ASD is difficult due to a number of methodological issues. However, there is emerging consensus that there is an overgrowth phenomenon in the CNS with regional specificity. It is the time course of brain development rather than the final product that is most disturbed in autism. More specifically, brain size is normal at birth, then undergoes precocious growth in the early post-natal period (at this time, the first symptoms also emerge). Young children show increases of 5-10% in both grey and white matter in frontal, temporal, and parietal brain regions, the amygdala, and -in particular- in frontal and temporal cortices. During middle childhood, a deceleration in age-related growth is noted with a possible premature neurodegeneration from adolescence. Further, fMRI studies have shown aberrant and reduced connectivity within the cortex and between cortical and subcortical neural systems. 

    Due to the heterogeneity of ASD, it is difficult to formulate a neuropsychological profile. Usually, there is a discrepancy between verbal IQ and performance IQ with performance IQ being higher. A core feature of ASD is delayed and/or abnormal language. In fact, concern about language development is often the precipitant for parents to seek help for their child. Other core problems of ASD are related to central coherence (the ability to derive overall meaning from bits of environmental information), social cognition (the ability to identify and interpret socially salient information), and theory of mind (the ability to mentalise and emphasise with the internal states of others). In line with this is the identification of impaired reading comprehension, often in the context of intact reading accuracy. Other academic difficulties in ASD (for instance in maths, writing, and spelling) may occur, but these are currently not well characterised.

    Treatment

    Early diagnosis is crucial for effective treatment of ASD. Yet, this is often problematic. Parents are often the first to notice abnormalities in their child. Yet, many report being reassured initially by family, paediatricians, and childcare workers. As a consequence, many children with milder forms of ASD are not identified until they attend school or even later. The challenge of (early) diagnosis is also complicated by the fact that symptoms vary or change over time. To date, there is no evidence-based 'cure' of ASD, but early, intensive intervention has been shown to improve the negative impact of ASD symptoms on the child and to reduce family stress. The greatest efficacy is found for multimodal treatment approaches, incorporating family psycho-education, parenting skills and individual behaviour modification programmes based on applied behaviour analysis (ABA) as well as appropriate, supportive educational placement. Treatment goals focus, among others, on trying to 'normalise' cognition, communication, and socialisation and to decrease maladaptive autism-specific behaviours such as rituals and rigidity as much as possible. Considering the heterogeneity of cognitive profiles in ASD, neuropsychological assessment should be a key component of any management and intervention plan. 

    What are the characteristics of Specific Language Impairment?

    Epidemiology

    Specific Language Impairment (SLI) is characterised by a failure to acquire language normally. SLI has an estimated prevalence rate ranging from 3% to 8% with boys more often affected than girls. In the DSM-5, SLI is proposed as a single category of Language Disorder, requiring a delay (skills below those expected for age, but otherwise not quantified) in the acquisition and use of language across modalities (oral, written) due to deficits in either comprehension or expression. To meet the criteria for SLI, the delay must appear early in life and cause functional impairment in communication, social participation, and academic achievement. In addition, the language difficulties cannot be attributed to environmental deprivation, intellectual disability, a speech-motor or hearing defect, or another disorder such as selective mutism, acquired epileptic aphasia or ASD. In other words, SLI occurs in the context of otherwise 'normal' development. 

    Aetiology

    It is likely that SLI has a strong genetic component. Twin studies suggest high heritability with evidence pointing towards the FOXP2 gene, in particular paternal deletions, in the aetiology of developmental verbal dyspraxia, which is a specific form of SLI. Recently, a review study has identified various other candidate genes, including CNTNAP2 and CMIP of chromosome 16q as important genes in SLI. Environmental factors are likely to play an influential role as well, although these are probably not causal in themselves. Examples of influential environmental factors are: impoverished home language environment, perinatal adversity, low SWS, low maternal education, a positive family history, and a bilingual language environment.

    Neuropathology

    Neuroimaging studies have identified a number of abnormalities in SLI, including neuronal migration disorders, abnormalities in the corpus callosum, anomalous cerebral lateralisation, and increased grey matter volume in the left inferior frontal cortex, as well as decreased grey matter volume in the right caudate nucleus and bilateral superior temporal cortex. In addition, the planum temporale (Wernicke's area) and the pars triangularis (Broca's area) are smaller on the left than the right hemisphere, whereas the reverse is true for normally developing children. 

    Neuropsychological findings

    A discrepancy is found between verbal IQ and performance IQ. Typically in children with SLI, verbal IQ falls in the borderline range, while performance IQ falls within the low average to average range, but still below that of healthy controls. Although there is a high degree of overlap in the language profiles of ASD and SLI, distinct cognitive profiles in these two conditions can be identified. More specifically, children with SLI show a relative absence of the idiosyncratic language and pragmatic deficits that is evident in children with ASD. Further, children with SLI can be discriminated from normally developing peers by their auditory perception, phonological short-term auditory memory, and working memory deficits. In addition, children with SLI exhibit deficits in both fine and gross motor skills. They also exhibit slowed processing speed. 

    Functional outcomes

    SLI is strongly associated with learning difficulties, in particular concerning language and literacy skills. Children with SLI are often viewed as inattentive or lazy in the classroom setting. This negative misconception may increase the risk for low self-esteem and an expectation of academic failure.

    Treatment

    A primary role in the assessment and treatment of children with SLI is provided by speech pathologists. However, considering the evidence described above for more overall information processing deficits, a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment is needed to identify specific strengths and weaknesses of children and to guide treatment planning and educational placement. In doing so, one must carefully consider the possible negative impact of receptive language deficits on comprehension of instructions on both verbal and non-verbal tasks. Finally, there is some evidence that parent-led interventions with clinician support may be as effective as clinician-led interventions. In addition, they have the advantage of being cost effective and encouraging generalisation of language gains into everyday life.

    Access: 
    Public
    What are the characteristics and consequences of childhood traumatic brain injury? - Chapter 9

    What are the characteristics and consequences of childhood traumatic brain injury? - Chapter 9

    Childhood traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a common cause of interruption to normal development. Depending on its severity, TBI may result in residual impairments in various skills, in particular information processing, attention, memory, learning, and social cognition. These deficits may adversely impact the capacity of the child to interact with the environment effectively, which in turn leads to lags in skill acquisition and increasing gaps between brain injured children and their peers. Studies focused on long-term follow-up of these children and their families found that, even with access to excellent rehabilitation resources, problems persist, although the nature of these problems changes with time after insult as well as with the developmental level of the child. It is difficult to predict the (long-term) outcomes of TBI, as the long-term consequences depend on a complex interaction of various factors, such as premorbid child abilities, socio-emotional functioning, characteristics of the brain injury, the environmental context, developmental stage of the child, access to rehabilitation, as well as factors yet to be identified. TBI is not equally common across the population; children with disadvantageous backgrounds and those with pre-existing behavioural and developmental impairments are are greater risk of both injury and poor recovery. Additional risk factors are post-injury parent and family stress and reduced or limited access to early intervention and support services. 

    What is currently known about the epidemiology of childhood traumatic brain injury?

    Gathering information about the incidence and prevalence of TBI is challenging. Epidemiological studies vary with respect to definitions of the injury, data sources, data collection techniques, case descriptions, and ages of target populations. Overall, population estimates point towards 250 - 799 cases per 100,000 per year. Approximately 80% of these refer to mild injuries, half of whom will not seek any medical care. Between 5-10% will experience temporary and/or permanent neuropsychological consequences, and another 5-10% will receive fatal injuries. Approximately one in every 30 new-born children will sustain a TBI before age 16.

    Across the lifespan, the most common causes of TBI are transportation-related accidents and falls. Together, they account for more than half of all childhood TBI. The nature of these accidents and falls differs for various developmental stages. Infants and toddlers are most likely to experience TBI through falls or via inflicted injuries secondary to child abuse. Young children are most likely to experience TBI through falls and motor vehicle collisions, either as occupants or pedestrians. Older children are most likely to experience TBI through sports and recreational accidents and pedestrian or bicycle collisions with motor vehicles. Adolescents are most likely to experience TBI through motor vehicle collisions and competitive sports.

    An important risk factor for the prognosis of TBI is age. Mortality and morbidity increase as age decreases. One study found a mortality rate of 50% for children experiencing TBI before the age of two, compared to only 14% for those injured after age 14. Another risk factor is age. Boys are at greater risk of sustaining TBI than girls, over the entire childhood. Another influential factor is timing. Child TBI is more likely to occur on the weekends, holidays, and afternoons, when children are out of school and involved in leisure activities.

    What is currently known about the neuropathology and pathophysiology of childhood traumatic brain injury?

    TBI is typically caused by a physical blow or wound to the head that is sufficient to result in altered consciousness and may lead to neurological or neurobehavioural sequelae. Although TBI is commonly characterised as a unitary entity, the mechanisms and underlying pathophysiology associated with these injuries vary significantly, resulting in a wide range of potential consequences. These consequences can be determined by various factors:

    1. The force of the impact.
    2. The intracranial vectors of transmitted force, that is linear or rotational.
    3. The thickness of the scalp and skull.
    4. The site of impact.
    5. The presence or absence of skull fracture. Generally, it can be said that the greater the force applied, the more severe the associated damage. 

    The most common form of TBI is closed head injury in which the brain is shaken within the skull cavity, resulting in diffuse axonal damage and multiple injury sites, but with the skull remaining intact. Closed head injury accounts for approximately 90% of all cases of childhood TBI. The remaining 10% of injuries come from penetrating injuries, which comprise penetration of the skull by some form of 'missile', frequently a bullet, rock, or knife. This is also associated with a risk of cerebral infection, swelling, bleeding, and raised intracranial pressure. Brain swelling, also called cerebral oedema, refers to an increase in fluid volume within the skull. This may occur either due to a failure of the auto regulatory mechanism of cerebral blood flow due to hypoxia, hypercapnia, or obstruction to cerebral circulation, or it may occur due to increased fluid within the brain associated with a range of possible causal factors, including obstruction of cerebrospinal fluid flow and increased intravascular pressure or damage to blood vessels. Brain swelling may occur regionalised or diffuse. 

    Brain damage resulting from TBI involves processes that are more complex, prolonged, and interwoven than previously thought. The consequences of childhood TBI differ from those observed in adults, because the immature brain responds differently to trauma than the mature brain does. The pathophysiology of TBI is classified on the basis of the initial injury. Primary injuries occur as a direct result of the impact of force on the brain and include fractures, contusions, and lacerations. Primary injuries are typically permanent and show little response to early treatment. Secondary injuries occur as a consequence of the primary injury. Two common types of secondary injuries are raised intracranial pressure and brain swelling. Other forms of secondary injuries are: hypoxia, infection, metabolic changes including hypothermia, electrolyte imbalance, and respiratory difficulties.

    Mass effects (haematomas), which are caused by vascular interruptions, are not very common in children. However, if not treated quickly (usually through surgical evacuation), such secondary complications can lead to cerebral herniation and ultimately death. Different types of haematomas are common to TBI. Epidural haematomas refer to bleeds just below the skull surface, above the dura. These doe not directly involve brain tissue and mostly occur in the context of skull fracture, where vessels in the meninges are damaged. Subdural haematomas refer to blood accumulation between the dura and the arachnoid mater. These occur more frequently than epidural haematomas and are also more serious. Lastly, intracerebral haematomas occur within brain parenchyma and follow the same spatial distribution as contusions. If treated promptly, the outcome from these complications is positive. However, if left untreated, increasing blood mass may cause cerebral shift and herniation.

    The type of insult and corresponding neuropathology are summarised in the table below.

    Type of insultNeuropathology
    Primary
    • Skull fracture
    • Intracranial contusions and laceration
    • Diffuse axonal injury
    Secondary
    • Brain swelling
    • Cerebral oedema
    • Elevated intracranial pressure
    • Hypoxic - ischaemia
    • Mass lesions (haematoma)
    Neurochemical
    • Excessive production of free radicals.
    • Excessive release of excitatory neurotransmitters.
    • Alterations in glucose metabolism.
    • Decreased cerebral blood flow.
    Late or delayed
    • White matter degeneration and cerebral atrophy.
    • Post-traumatic hydrocephalus.
    • Post-traumatic seizures. 

    What are important components in diagnosis and early recovery?

    Childhood TBI can cause significant impairments in a variety of domains, including alertness, orientation, motor function, language, communication, non-verbal skills, attention, memory, and executive functions. These functional deficits are typically evident in the acute stages post-TBI, once the child regains consciousness and becomes alert and orientated. 

    Evaluation and treatment of childhood TBI begins at the scene of the jury, where the state of consciousness and the neurological status are assessed. By the time the child reaches the hospital, he or she will already have sustained permanent primary impact-related brain injury. Secondary effects will also begin to manifest and may warrant medical intervention. Early treatment is very much focused on accurate identification of these secondary effects and their rapid treatment. Important markers at this stage are: level of consciousness, clinical evidence of skull fracture or cerebral pathology, and neurological and mental status. Level of consciousness forms the most important measure of assessing the severity of the injury. A further measure of severity is post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) duration. PTA refers to the period of confusion and disorientation following the injury or emergence from coma. This period is characterised by attentional impairment and memory disturbance. 

    Important techniques in assessing the brain pathology are provided by brain imaging, in particular computed tomography (CT) scans, structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) or diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI), magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), functional MRI (fMRI) and functional connectivity, quantitative methods for structural MRI, and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). 

    • Computed tomography (CT) scans are useful for clinical decision making, because they rapidly detect lesions that need immediate medical intervention, such as large haematomas or skull fractures. 
    • Structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) makes use of a magnetic field strength to align atoms in the body. Radio frequency pulses are emitted to alter this alignment, causing nuclei to produce a rotating magnetic field detected by the scanned and reconstructed into images. MRI scans are more sensitive than CT scans, in particular for detecting diffuse axon injury (DAI). In addition, MRI scans have a reduced risk of radiation exposure in comparison to CT scans.
    • Diffusion weighted imaging (DMI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) are particularly useful for assessing the integrity of white matter, including damage or degeneration of white matter fibres through breakdown of myelin and nerve terminals, or neuronal swelling or shrinkage. 
    • Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) is a specific MRI technique that exploits the magnetic susceptibility differences between tissues. It is beneficial for lesion detection, making it useful for identifying micro haemorrhages and other small, diffuse lesions that are typical for traumatic or diffuse axonal injury.
    • Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) measures the relative concentration of metabolites in brain tissue using spectroscopic analysis. MRS can provide additional neuropathological information that is useful in predicting recovery following childhood TBI.
    • Functional MRI (fMRI) makes use of the blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) technique to measure cerebral activity, often in response to stimulation. Although fMRI has diagnostic potential, it is generally not part of clinical practice. 
    • Quantitative methods for structural MRI quantify brain volume or voxel-based morphometry. They provide information on the structural integrity of regions of interest in the brain. These methods have been used extensively in assessing brain pathology in childhood TBI.
    • Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) refers to a portable, relatively non-invasive technique that can be used to assess brain function by detecting changes in blood haemoglobin levels associated with neural activity via use of infrared light. NIRS has particular benefits for infants and young children who are difficult to assess via CT or MRI scans without sedation. It also has the potential to associate brain activity in response to stimulation. A disadvantage of NIRS is that near-infrared light is not capable to penetrate to the level of subcortical structures, hence it is restricted to use at the cortical level. 

    What are the stages of recovery following childhood TBI?

    Although outcome is difficult to predict, the stages of recovery following childhood TBI follow a relatively routine path depending on the severity of the brain injury. A distinction here is made between the rather rapid and uncomplicated recovery following mild brain injury, in which residual sequelae are minimal, and the more protracted process that follows from moderate and severe TBI, in which extended hospitalisation and ongoing rehabilitation may be needed.

    Recovery after mild TBI

    Directly after mild TBI (mTBI), there is a short period of altered consciousness, possibly even with loss of consciousness. This period is usually associated with symptoms of confusion and disorientation. Typically, children are observed for a brief period and discharged home without hospitalisation. In the following days, there is a high risk of post-concussive symptoms characterised by transient impairments in cognition (memory, attention, executive function, and processing speed), physical condition (fatigue, headache, nausea), and psychological condition (irritability, mood change, and emotional dysregulation). These post-concussive symptoms tend to reflect more cognitive problems and are more persistent in children compared to adults experiencing TBI. In fact, there appears to be a delayed recovery pattern in children and adolescents post-mTBI in approximately 20% of the sufferers, which is not yet well understood. Characteristic consequences of mTBI are: reduced attention, slowed response speeds, impaired memory, fatigue, and irritability. Note that these skills are crucial for daily activities, including acquiring new knowledge and skills as well as attending to school work. In addition to these cognitive problems, children with mTBI may also experience behavioural difficulties post-concussion, including headache, pressure in the head, dizziness, fatigue, sleep disturbance, restlessness, sensitivity to noise and vision, blurred or double vision, nausea, and tinnitus. With regard to the long-term consequences, there is some controversy in the literature. Some studies found few, if any, impairments in intellectual ability, attention, or memory function. Others found a significant subgroup of injured children (up to 30%) that failed to achieve full symptom resolution, exhibiting psychological and cognitive difficulties. The suggestion has been made to divide this group into mild and mild-complicated categories to aid diagnosis and prognosis. 

    Recovery after moderate and severe TBI

    Recovery from moderate and severe TBI is more prolonged than from mild TBI and may be seen as a multi-phase process where there is an interaction between the physical recovery of the child, its developmental level, the family response, and the reintegration of the child back into society. Typically, children with moderate of severe TBI are hospitalised for some time. During this time, the child's progress is carefully monitored for evidence of deterioration caused by raised intracranial pressure or haematoma, which would require surgery. At this stage, physical rehabilitation starts, focused on maintaining the child's physical strength and on basic activities such as feeding. During this stage, there is a high degree of anxiety for the family, caused by the concern about their child's survival. After the child emerges from coma, fears for survival diminish and active rehabilitation begins. During this stage, the child may appear restless, agitated, confused, and disorientated. Functional impairments will become evident. More intensive rehabilitation begins, including physical and speech therapy. The goal is to be able to return home to a familiar environment. After discharge, the child continues to receive regular rehabilitation. Returning to school is typically a gradual process, starting with attending school for short periods, primarily for social contact, and then extending this period by attending more classes as the child gains physical strength. This stage requires a degree of balancing between rehabilitation goals, needs of social adjustment of the child and school, and family resources. It requires effective communication between therapists, children, and families. Some children demonstrate a relatively full recovery after more severe TBI, whereas others demonstrate ongoing residual impairments, necessitating life-long medical and rehabilitation involvement. 

    What are the neurobehavioural and functional consequences of childhood traumatic brain injury?

    Childhood traumatic brain injury is associated with a wide range of neurobehavioural and functional consequences:

    • Impaired intellectual functioning.
    • Impaired language and communication skills (e.g., expressive and receptive language deficits, word-finding difficulties, and complex comprehension deficits).
    • Impaired non-verbal and motor skills (fine motor coordination, reduced motor control, and motor planning).
    • Deficits in attention and information processing skills (these are the hallmarks of severe TBI).
    • Memory impairment (difficulties acquiring knowledge and learning).
    • Deficits in executive functions (e.g., planning and mental flexibility).
    • Impaired socio-emotional skills (social dysfunction).
    • Behavioural and psychiatric disorders.
    • Academic difficulties (inability to cope in standard classrooms, declines in performance).

    What are predictors of outcome?

    Although it is difficult to predict outcome following childhood traumatic brain injury, some predictors have been identified that may play a role in the process. First, injury severity is a well-established predictor of outcome following TBI. There is overall agreement that moderate to severe TBI results in substantial and persistent morbidity, whereas mTBI is more benign. Second, age at injury is an predictor of outcome. While not identified in the case of mTBI, current evidence demonstrates that young children sustaining generalised brain insult are at an elevated risk for long-term cognitive deficits. Third, recent research has begun to focus on non-injury related factors, including premorbid attention problems, increasing the risk of post-injury attention problems among children with severe TBI. Other, environmental, factors are also considered to be important for outcome following TBI, including socio-economic status and several family demographics, measures of parent mental health, family function, and family burden. 

    How to treat childhood traumatic brain injury?

    Treatment and management of TBI requires long-term clinical involvement. The role of the psychologist here is multidimensional, being responsible for monitoring neurobehavioural recovery, understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the child, communicating with teachers and rehabilitation workers, designing cognitive interventions and behavior management programmes, providing counseling with regard to adjustment issues for the child and family, and informing parents and others in the wider community about the implications of the child's injuries for daily functioning. At the clinical level, families are involved with therapists to identify meaningful goals for rehabilitation. One study demonstrated that children who received home-based cognitive, behavioural, and physical intervention from their parents had significantly improved outcomes in comparison to children who received routine hospital-based rehabilitation. 

    Access: 
    Public
    What are the characteristics of childhood epilepsy? - Chapter 10

    What are the characteristics of childhood epilepsy? - Chapter 10

    Epilepsy is a symptom, not a cause, of brain dysfunction. Epilepsy may result from a range of disorders, including traumatic injury, cerebral infection, and metabolic disorders. Epilepsy is the most common neurological condition in childhood. Its prevalence is around 5 in every 1,000 children with the highest incidence in infancy, in particular the first year. These numbers are higher in developing countries. In fact, approximately 80% of people with epilepsy live in the developing world. The prevalence rate of childhood epilepsy is so high because the developing brain is more prone to seizures, in particular during infancy, reflecting immaturity of both signalling systems and the morphological and structural organisation of neuronal networks. 

    Over the past decade, our understanding of epilepsy has changed drastically. To date, epilepsy is conceptualised as a brain network disease, which has particular implications for the assessment of children with epilepsy. In fact, if epilepsy is a disease of brain networks, and cognition and behaviour are primary functions of those brain networks, then epilepsy is as much a disorder of cognition and behaviour as it is of seizures. The diagnosis of epilepsy is made on clinical grounds with examinations used to confirm the diagnosis, characterise the seizure disorder, and determine the underlying cause. In doing so, an EEG can aid in the diagnosis of specific epilepsy syndromes and distinguish focal from generalised seizures. Video-EEG may be needed when the diagnosis remains uncertain. Brain imaging, such as MRI, is used when an underlying abnormality is suspected. Typically, the first treatment option is anti-epileptic drugs (AED). A second treatment option (occurring in approximately 30% of children) is formed by surgery. Epilepsy has a high rate of comorbidity, including comorbid developmental delay (22%), speech and language deficits and learning difficulties (23%), and intellectual disability (68%). 

    How to define and classify epilepsy?

    A common language for defining and classifying epilepsy, which will be used in this chapter, is provided by the Commission on Classification and Terminology (CCT). An epileptic seizure refers to a transient occurrence of signs and/or symptoms due to abnormal excessive or synchronous neuronal activity in the brain. Seizures can be provoked (if associated with precipitating factors such as illness or an acute brain insult) or unprovoked (without identification of a specific precipitating factor). Commonly, seizures in childhood are provoked by feveralso called febrile seizures, and do not result in a diagnosis of epilepsy. Epilepsy is defined as a disorder of the brain characterised by an enduring predisposition of the brain to generate seizures and by the neurobiological, cognitive, psychological, and social consequences of this condition. The following operational clinical definition is used to guide diagnosis of epilepsy:

    1. At least two unprovoked or reflex seizures occurring more than 24 hours apart.
    2. One unprovoked or reflex seizure and a probability of more seizures similar to the general recurrence risk (at least 60%) after two unprovoked seizures occurring over the next ten years.
    3. Diagnosis of an epilepsy syndrome. Epilepsy is considered to be resolved for individuals who had age-dependent epilepsy syndrome, but are not past the applicable age or those who have remained seizure free for the last ten years and without medication for the last five years. 

    The inclusion of diagnosis of an epilepsy syndrome (point 3) enables the clinical definition to extend to children with rare forms of epilepsy, such as Landau-Kleffner syndrome (LKS) who may not have overt seizures, but demonstrate changes in function as a result of underlying epileptic activity. Epileptic encephalopathy (EE) refers to a condition in which the epileptic activity itself may contribute to severe cognitive and behavioural impairments above and beyond what is expected from the underlying pathology alone and may worsen over time. 

    Besides a clinical classification, the ILAE has adopted an operational (practical) classification of seizure type which starts with the determination of seizure onset as focal (originate within networks limited to one hemisphere) or generalised (originate within and rapidly engage bilaterally distributed networks). A third category is provided for seizures with unknown onset. Next, within both focal, generalised, and unknown onset, seizures are further classified as either motor onset or non-motor onset and then into a number of further subtypes. Epileptic spasms can be of focal, generalised or unknown onset and are characterised by sudden and brief contractions of axial (neck and trunk) and proximal limb muscles. They usually occur in clusters of varying intensity in which the intensity depends on severity of muscle contraction and the number of muscle groups that is involved. 

    Grouping seizures by specific characteristics as was done before is clinical useful, but has limited relevance for the treatment and management of epilepsy. Children with the same seizure type may vary greatly in prognosis and response to treatment. In fact, it is well-established that certain individuals share common characteristics beyond seizure type and that these grouping can be identified as distinct epilepsy syndromes. The definition of what constitutes a epilepsy syndrome refers to a group of clinical entities identified by a cluster of electroclinical characteristics. These electroclinical syndromes can be identified on the basis of:

    1. Age of onset.
    2. Specific EEG characteristics.
    3. Seizures types.
    4. Cognitive and developmental antecedents and consequences.
    5. Motor and sensory examination.
    6. Provoking or triggering factors.
    7. Patterns of seizure occurrence with regard to sleep.

    Diagnosis of such a specific epilepsy syndrome has important implications for treatment and prognosis. 

    The ILAE proposed a new classification system. The new framework for classification is a multilevel classification which adopts a more flexible approach to the classification of epilepsy. The first level classifies seizure type (focal, generalised, or unknown). The second level classifies epilepsy types (focal, generalised, combined generalised, unknown). The third level classifies epilepsy syndromes, in which a specific syndromic diagnosis can be made. In addition, consideration of associated comorbidities and aetiologies is included in the framework.

    What are the causes of seizures and epilepsy?

    Seizures are the result of abnormal firing of neurons. Aetiology forms a key concept guiding the treatment and management of children with epilepsy. In doing so, six aetiologic subgroups have been proposed:

    1. Genetic.
    2. Structural.
    3. Metabolic.
    4. Immune.
    5. Infectious.
    6. Unknown (cryptogenetic / presumed symptomatic).

    Over the past decades, our understanding of the causes of epilepsy has improved greatly. In 1975, the majority of epilepsy were characterised as 'idiopathic' (genetic). Nowadays, epilepsy of unknown cause comprises a much smaller proportion due to the discovery of autoimmune epilepsies, epilepsies with lesions that are only identifiable with MRI and, most importantly, the reclassification of many epilepsies that were previously considered idiopathic as having a genetic cause. 

    What are the characteristics of common genetic epilepsies?

    Childhood absence epilepsy (CAE)

    Childhood absence epilepsy (CAE) is the most common of the genetic, generalised epilepsies and accounts for 8-15% of all childhood epilepsies. On average, it starts around age six. Absence seizures (a type of seizures involving staring spells which usually last less than fifteen seconds) are the only seizures that manifest themselves in CAE, yet they can occur frequently, sometimes in the hundreds each day. These absence seizures are enhanced by hyperventilation. CAE is probably caused via a complex inheritance with several gene mutations. Standard treatment is provided by anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs). CAE typically enables a good prognosis, although recent studies indicate an increased risk of cognitive, learning, and behavioural disorders. 

    Benign epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes (BECTS)

    Benign epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes (BECTS) is the most commonly occurring genetic focal epilepsy syndrome in childhood. BECTS typically has an onset between age four and ten with a peak around seven years. The tendency for remission by the onset of adolescence explains the label for this condition as being benign. Seizures are infrequent and manifest with motor and/or sensory signs involving the face, for example unilateral tonic or clonic contractions, and mouth, with speech arrest and hyper salivation also commonly observed. In AED, seizures often occur at night while the child is asleep and may occur so infrequently that AEDs are not prescribed. BECTS is associated with normal cognitive functioning and has an excellent prognosis, although there is a growing body of evidence suggesting poorer performance on a range of functional measures. 

    Dravet syndrome

    Dravet syndrome, also known as severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy, is a rare yet severe form of genetic epilepsy. Seizures typically begin in the first year of life in a previously healthy baby with no known risk factors for epilepsy. Various types of seizures may occur over time. Seizures may triggered by heat, physical exertions, and variations in light (strobing, eye closure, visual patterns, and so forth). Typically, early developmental milestones are met, but development declines in the second year of life and continues to a global developmental delay in which the child may even lose previously established skills. Prognosis is typically poor. Most children remain fully dependent with a degree of intellectual disability. 

    What are the characteristics of structural (focal) epilepsies?

    Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE)

    Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) may occur at any range, as is typical for focal epilepsies, but onset in later childhood and adolescence is common. The seizures are characterised by motionless staring, fearful or bewildered facial expression, unresponsiveness, hand and mouth movements that resemble voluntary actions, and post-ictal confusion or sleepiness. 

    Frontal lobe epilepsy

    Frontal lobe epilepsy involves seizures that result from frontal lobe pathology and often occur from sleep. These seizures are brief in duration and typically manifest themselves with prominent motor features such as unilateral or bilateral stiffening or jerking, loud vocalisation, and hyperkinetic automatisms such as tapping, cycling, or running. Seizures may occur multiple times a night. Outcome and prognosis depends on the degree to which cognitive networks are disrupted by the underlying pathology.

    What are the characteristics of combined structural - genetic epilepsies?

    Tuberous slecorsis (TS)

    Tuberous sclerosis (TS) refers to an inherited neurocutaneous disease of cell differentiation and proliferation, which affects multiple organs. The earlier the age of seizure onset, the worse the outcome. Seizures initially manifest as epileptic spams and are associated with developmental slowing and even regression. Early and effective treatment (possibly surgery if the tubers responsible for the seizures can be localised) may decrease the developmental impact of TS. 

    Landau-Kleffner syndrome (LKS)

    Lastly, Landau-Kleffner syndrome (LKS), also known as acquired epileptic aphasia, is part of a spectrum of epileptic encephalopathies (EE) characterised by a markedly abnormal EEG pattern during sleep, known as electrical status of slow wave sleep (ESES). LKS typically has its onset between age three and ten and is characterised by verbal auditory agnosia (the inability to make sense of speech sounds). Some children develop even a complete inability to interpret environmental sounds and are, for example, not able to interpret dogs barking. Other deficits that may develop are related to motor skills, behaviour and attention. 

    How to treat epilepsy?

    The first treatment option typically is anti-epileptic drugs (AED). Almost half of the patients will become seizure free after the first prescribed AED. Yet, it is important to note that the prognosis in terms of seizure control for people who do not respond to the first prescribed AED rapidly decreases with the failure of each subsequent AED to provide good control. When choosing to treat epilepsy with AEDs, the goal is to control seizures with a single medication and to avoid negative side effects. Initial choice of a particular AED depends on seizure type and epilepsy syndrome. Commonly reported side effects are related to learning and behavioural difficulties.

    Another treatment option is surgery. Surgery may be considered when AED treatment fails to manage the epilepsy effectively or when it can offer the child a good chance of a life free of seizures and without the need for medication. Success of surgery depends on accurately locating the epileptogenic lesion, usually via neuroimaging, in which complete resection is the best predictor of postoperative seizure freedom. Surgery is typically preceded by pre-surgery assessment, in which video-EEG monitoring and anatomical MRI are core components. 

    Other treatment options include dietary modifications, including the ketogenetic diet (high in fat, low in carbohydrate, and moderate in protein intake) as well as a range of psychological therapies, including relaxation therapy, cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT), and biofeedback. These psychological therapies may help in managing identified 'triggers' for seizures, such as stress, lifestyle factors, and comorbid psychological problems such as depression. 

    Access: 
    Public
    Which elements are necessary for child neuropsychological evaluation? - Chapter 11

    Which elements are necessary for child neuropsychological evaluation? - Chapter 11

    The aim of this chapter is to discuss the elements that are necessary for child neuropsychological evaluation. These elements, which will be discussed into more detail in the remainder of this chapter, are:

    1. Nature of presenting problem.
    2. Background history.
    3. Qualitative data, including direct observation and parent/teacher observation.
    4. Quantitative data, including intellectual evaluation, evaluation of specific skills, and functional skills.
    5. Formulation and diagnosis.
    6. Feedback and treatment.
    7. Evaluation of intervention.

    Typically, best practice in child neuropsychological evaluation avoids reliance on any single source of information or data. Instead, information regarding different factors and from various sources is collected and integrated in a meaningful way. Such different sources may include: medical history, developmental history, psychological factors (of both the child and his or her family, e.g., coping style, well-being, recent family disruptions and so forth, behavioural observations, and quantitative methods such as a standardised paper-and-pencil task. Typically, neuropsychological evaluation is comprehensive, comprising various domains, including: cognitive evaluation (intellectual function), assessment of specific cognitive skills (attention, learning and memory , executive function, processing speed, visuo-perceptive / visuo-spatial / visuo-constructive skills, speech and language, motor, perceptual, and sensory skills), assessment of behavioural and adaptive function (social cognition and social competence), and assessment of academic and/or vocational achievement. Finally, collating these various information sources is the final and most important aspect of neuropsychological evaluation. The goal is to achieve a formulation that is reliable, objective, and accurate. One the child's pattern of strengths and weaknesses has been identified and interpreted, the next step is to use this information to devise appropriate rehabilitation and interventions. 

    What is child neuropsychological assessment?

    Neuropsychological assessment refers to the evaluation of brain - behaviour relationships, which is at the heart of neuropsychological practice. Child neuropsychological assessment may serve various goals:

    1. To provide information regarding the integrity of the brain via comprehensive cognitive assessment.
    2. To detect and diagnose the presence of symptoms, syndromes, or disorders.
    3. To characterise the cognitive strengths and weaknesses of the child.
    4. To guide children and their care team towards appropriate treatment and rehabilitation.
    5. To monitor outcomes and evaluate the efficacy of treatment and intervention. 

    Thus, child neuropsychological assessment aids in the understanding of an individual's deficits and provides an important contribution to treatment and rehabilitation of the individual. The specific goal for a neuropsychological assessment typically depends on the setting. For example, in acute hospital settings, assessments are typically brief, basic, conducted at the bedside, and mainly aimed at determining the child's level of consciousness, alertness, and orientation. More comprehensive evaluations tend to be conducted in secondary care settings, such as outpatient clinics and rehabilitation units, schools or private practice. These assessments involve longer, more targeted assessment in order to, for example, obtain information across a wide range of functional domains to formulate a comprehensive neuropsychological profile. Child neuropsychological assessment is different generic psychological evaluation, not so much by the test measures used, but by the interpretation of the data resulting from those measures. In neuropsychological assessment, assessment data with medical information need to be interpreted in the context of the child's day-to-day life and to provide assistance and direction for managing and treating the deficits of the child. The relationship between brain (structure) and behaviour (function) is key. Over the past years, a paradigm shift has occurred, from localisation of function models to an understanding that cognitive functions are dependent on a diffuse neural network, in which disruption results in a wide range of consequences. 

    What are the reasons for referral of neuropsychological evaluation?

    Typically, child neuropsychological assessment represents a tertiary intervention, because most children referred already have undergone medical assessment and many have also been assessed for sensory, speech, and educational status. Child neuropsychologists frequently receive referrals for the assessment of various medical and neuropsychological conditions. Most referrals simply require an opinion regarding the nature and severity of the problems of the child. More sophisticated requests which may require fine-grained evaluation of cognitive or learning skills or advice regarding appropriate educational placement, treatment, and management, occur less common. Children seen for neuropsychological evaluation can be divided into a number of categories:

    1. Neonatal and acquired brain insult (PT birth, TBI, tumour, epilepsy, cerebral infection).
    2. Congenital disorders involving structural brain insult (spina bifida and cerebral palsy).
    3. Medical disorders that impact brain function (diabetes, phenylketonuria, cardiac disease).
    4. Genetic and metabolic disorders (Klinefelter syndrome, galactasaemia, Wilson's disease).
    5. Neuropsychiatric disorders with impaired brain function (autism, ADHD, learning disability).

    What are the principles of child neuropsychological assessment?

    Three principles have to be taken into account: 

    1. Developmental considerations: consider the specific trajectory of cognitive and social development, emphasising the importance of age-appropriate, well-normed assessment tools).
    2. Socio-emotional considerations: a child may behave differently in an unfamiliar hospital setting).
    3. Environmental considerations: multiple dimensions of environmental influence; social history, access to resources, impact of family factors, such as marital problems, parental depression, and sibling conflict). 
    Access: 
    Public
    What are the key characteristics of interventions for children with early brain injury? - Chapter 12

    What are the key characteristics of interventions for children with early brain injury? - Chapter 12

    The goal of treatment practices for children with brain disorders is to obtain the best possible outcome across cognitive, social, behavioural, and functional domains. To obtain this ultimate goal, the two primary aims of paediatric rehabilitation for children with brain injury are:

    1. To reduce the daily consequences of impaired cognitive functioning.
    2. To reduce the level of handicap, with the ultimate goal of community reintegration. 

    In order to achieve these goals, the focus in the paediatric context comprises working with both the child and his or her family to identify an association between impairments and functional or everyday difficulties. Many interventions have been developed, although few are specifically designed for children with early brain insult, in particular interventions with a neuropsychological orientation are rare. Instead, the focus is more commonly on the paediatric domain in order to reintegrate the child back to home and back to school as soon as possible. In line with this, in this chapter, common models of intervention will be discussed in the context of school and home, both of which form major settings in children's life. In choosing an intervention it is best practice to, wherever possible, select an evidence-based intervention, meaning that this intervention has been tested thoroughly through high-quality trials. 

    What are the two primary settings in which rehabilitation plays an important role? 

    For children with brain injury, entry or reintegration into the school environment is commonly seen as a very important step in the recovery process. Initially, the aim is to enhance socialisation and adjustment, even if the child is not ready yet to benefit from the educational curriculum. Hence, the school becomes a de facto rehabilitation provider, in which often there is no previous expertise in working with children with neuropsychological deficits. Optimally, the school, family, and rehabilitation team collaborate via regular school meetings and less formal contact in order to provide an appropriate context and educational programme for the child. It is the role of the neuropsychologist to inform the child's teacher(s) about the neurobehavioural strengths and weaknesses and the way these may manifest themselves in the classroom or playground. The most critical task of the neuropsychologist is to communicate medical and assessment data to non-experts, such as teachers and family. A model for this has been proposed by Rourke and colleagues (1996), suggesting that relevant factors for consideration are:

    1. The types of skills impaired.
    2. The number of skills impaired.
    3. The degree of impairment.
    4. The capacity of the child for adaptation.
    5. The quality of intact abilities.

    These five factors should be integrated with the demands of the child's environment, both in the academic and social context. Furthermore, in order to design a realistic and feasible intervention program, these factors should be taken into account when formulating the treatment goals. 

    The neuropsychologist may also contribute to the development and evaluation of specific educational or behavioural programmes, with the emphasis on:

    1. The importance of understanding the demands of the child's environment.
    2. Setting realistic and achievable therapy goals.
    3. Providing the child, family, and school workers regular feedback on the progress.

    Frequently, accessible supports are provided through community-based early intervention services. Typically, these focus on maximising development in speech and language and motor skills, with behaviour management where necessary. In addition, because many children with brain injury exhibit social and behavioural problems (such as impeded social development and social interaction, as well as social isolation), a range of interventions has been developed that may be helpful within the classroom and playground. Sometimes, it may also be beneficial to discuss the medical condition of the child with the class, for example when the child has epilepsy, in order to demystify any unusual aspects of the child's presentation. The child may be referred to a supportive group of peers or playground activities may be structured such that the child is able to join. These and similar elements can be integrated into comprehensive behavioural management programmes.

    In addition to focus on school context, the scope of rehabilitation and intervention following early brain injury also needs to address family issues. Again, the neuropsychologist can contribute here by combining knowledge of the likely behavioural and social effects of brain injury with an understanding of normal development and adjustment responses and the role of the family in these domains. 

    Which two perspectives on rehabilitation are there? 

    Broadly speaking, neuropsychological interventions for children with either acquired or developmental brain disorders fall into one of two categories: substitution or restoration of function. Each of these perspectives attempts to minimise the consequences of neurobehavioural deficits and to maximise the opportunity to utilise the strengths of the child. 

    Substitution of function is perhaps the most popular approach to neuropsychological rehabilitation. Here, the idea is to train and support the individual to perform various activities using alternative strategies or to modify the environment of the child, enabling the child to compensate for his or her cognitive deficits and hence decreasing the functional impact of the deficit. 

    Restoration of function aim to restore the function. Methods focus on improving the individual's capacities, for example attention, by re-establishment of impaired functions. Restorative interventions are developed to treat the consequences of brain injury and acquire an initial evaluation to identify impaired abilities. Next, the child is trained using specific exercises or activities focusing on deficient cognitive abilities in an attempt to improve these abilities as well as to impact more generally on cognitive functions. Rather than focusing on the strengths of the child, here the focus is on the weaknesses of the child, and the goal of the intervention is to develop these skills (back) to normal levels via training. Next to methods that directly focus on the impaired ability, there is also an indirect approach. Such an indirect approach avoids the impaired skill and provides training for peripheral skills. The underlying assumption here is that the specific deficit of the child is due to a problem in a related skill area. For instance, in the context of learning disabilities, sensorimotor integration programmes are often used with the rationale being that an improvement in sensorimotor skills yields increased reading proficiency.

    Access: 
    Public
    Access: 
    Public

    Image

    Check more: this content refers to
    Psychology and behavioral sciences - Theme
    Join: WorldSupporter!

    Join with a free account for more service, or become a member for full access to exclusives and extra support of WorldSupporter >>

    Check: concept of JoHo WorldSupporter

    Concept of JoHo WorldSupporter

    JoHo WorldSupporter mission and vision:

    • JoHo wants to enable people and organizations to develop and work better together, and thereby contribute to a tolerant and sustainable world. Through physical and online platforms, it supports personal development and promote international cooperation is encouraged.

    JoHo concept:

    • As a JoHo donor, member or insured, you provide support to the JoHo objectives. JoHo then supports you with tools, coaching and benefits in the areas of personal development and international activities.
    • JoHo's core services include: study support, competence development, coaching and insurance mediation when departure abroad.

    Join JoHo WorldSupporter!

    for a modest and sustainable investment in yourself, and a valued contribution to what JoHo stands for

    Check: how to help
    Share: this page!
    Follow: Psychology Supporter (author)
    Add: this page to your favorites and profile
    Statistics
    5594 1
    Submenu & Search

    Search only via club, country, goal, study, topic or sector