Single Case Studies - ARMS (neuropsychology)
If you have norm-data available, you assess a patients data using norm-tables such as this one:
You correct for age and education, and correct the score for this, using the table. Then you look in what scale the patient’s score is:
And you look what percentile the scale lies in:
But what if your patient has motor impairment or couldn’t draw or speak well? Then you can’t use this test. Options:
- Use a different test
- Make a new test. But: there are no norm data. So make your own!
- Good match: same age, gender education level
- Good control group: no neuropsychological disorders
- Sample size?
Imagine you have a mean and SD from a population and you want to know if your patient’s score differs significantly from this? Use a z-test:
Fill this in:
If your Z score is lower than the critical z score, it is significant! If you do a one-tailed test: it is -1.65.
From the z-score you can also calculate the p-value (in excel):
- Z=normsinv(p)
- p=normsdist(Z)
If your own control group is the red line, but the population/normscores is the black line, you will get different results. Your patient (green) does not differ from the actual population/normscores, but does from your own controlgroup. This is a type 1 error/false alarm.
How to score a ROCF test:
- Score the test using test manual, and assign points.
- Correct the scores
- Translate to scale
- Translate to percentile
A different statistical test (than z-test) you can use to know the difference between your control group and the population is the one-sample t-test.
- Z-test: we treat the stdev and mean of the sample as population representative. This results in a bigger type 1 error.
- One sample t-test: uses sample stdev and takes into account number of participants. Lower chance of type 1 error.
With the modified t-test you can compare one participant to the control group:
Test significant --> person deviates from control group.
In a monte carlo simulation, you test the chance of a type 1 error. The z-test has more type 1 errors in low N's than the modified t-test, also if it is skewed.
When conducting a t-test, look at the critical t-value table to see if your result is significant. If you work with a participant, you look at the one tailed significance level. The df (degrees of freedom) is the amount of control participants – 1. The critical t-value that you read in the table tells you: all the absolute values higher than the critical t-value are significant.
In the program SINGLIMS_ES you can also compute the t-value.
Dissocation: a patient deviates in one task, but does not in another task. Then there could be a dissociation between the two tasks.
The criteria for dissociations are:
- Patient differs from controls on task X
- Patient doesn’t differ from controls on task Y
- Patient’s performance on task X and Y differ
Before you compare two tasks (to check criteria 3), you have to standardize the scores. The revised standardized difference test lets you compare two tasks with standardized scores:
You can compute this formula in the Dissocs_ES program.
Report your results the right way!
Questions? Let me know in the contribution section!
Follow me for more summaries on statistics!
Join with a free account for more service, or become a member for full access to exclusives and extra support of WorldSupporter >>
Concept of JoHo WorldSupporter
JoHo WorldSupporter mission and vision:
- JoHo wants to enable people and organizations to develop and work better together, and thereby contribute to a tolerant tolerant and sustainable world. Through physical and online platforms, it support personal development and promote international cooperation is encouraged.
JoHo concept:
- As a JoHo donor, member or insured, you provide support to the JoHo objectives. JoHo then supports you with tools, coaching and benefits in the areas of personal development and international activities.
- JoHo's core services include: study support, competence development, coaching and insurance mediation when departure abroad.
Join JoHo WorldSupporter!
for a modest and sustainable investment in yourself, and a valued contribution to what JoHo stands for
- 1498 keer gelezen
Lectures Advanced Research Methods and Statistics for Psychology (ARMS)
- 3013 keer gelezen
Lectures Advanced Research Methods and Statistics for Psychology (ARMS)
- Lecture 1: Multiple Linear regression (ARMS, Utrecht University)
- Lecture 2: Moderation & Mediation (ARMS, Utrecht University)
- Seminar 1: Bootstrapping (ARMS, Utrecht University)
- Lecture 3: ANOVA & ANCOVA (ARMS, Utrecht University)
- Lecture 4: Factorial ANOVA & MANOVA (ARMS, Utrecht University)
- Seminar 2: Open Science (ARMS, Utrecht University)
- Lecture 5: Repeated Measures Analysis & Mixed Designs (ARMS, Utrecht University)
- Know your Data - ARMS (neuropsychologie)
- Signal Detection Theory - ARMS (neuropsychology)
- Single Case Studies - ARMS (neuropsychology)
Work for JoHo WorldSupporter?
Volunteering: WorldSupporter moderators and Summary Supporters
Volunteering: Share your summaries or study notes
Student jobs: Part-time work as study assistant in Leiden

Contributions: posts
Lectures Advanced Research Methods and Statistics for Psychology (ARMS)
In this bundle you can find the lecture and seminar notes for the course 'Advanced Research Methods and Statistics for Psychology (ARMS)'. I followed this course on Utrecht University, during the bachelor (neuro)psychology.
Follow me for more summaries!
Search only via club, country, goal, study, topic or sector









Add new contribution