“Davy (2015). The DSM-5 and the politics of diagnosing transpeople.” – Article summary
The emphasis on distress in the diagnosis of gender dysphoria is problematic in two ways:
- This may reduce access to treatment and legal recognition for transpeople who do not experience chronic or intermittent gender dysphoria.
- This may represent the lives of transpeople.
The true transsexual model referred to a person who required physical changes to their body to fully express their gender identity. However, many transpeople are not able to get these changes due to social, cultural or political reasons. Besides that, this model is focussed on the gender binary and neglects the true experience of transpeople.
It is difficult to call transpeople gender atypical as there is no clear cause for gender behaviour and there is no clear masculine or feminine behaviour. The DSM-5 criteria for gender dysphoria are derived from stereotypes applied in gender identity clinics serving transpeople.
Blanchard’s model states that there are two types of transsexuals:
- Autogynephiles
These are transsexuals who are aroused by the idea of having a female body. - Homosexuals
These are homosexual males who transition to make it easier to make themselves sexually attractive to heterosexual men.
This model strongly links gender dysphoria to homosexuality and cross-dressing and is heavily contested. For example, autogynephilic fantasies (i.e. imagining having sex as a female) are not specific to transwomen. This model is used in the DSM-5 as these subtypes are used for gender dysphoria. This needlessly sexualizes the diagnosis, which may exacerbate social discrimination and intensify the stigma.
Clinical encounters may not fully account for the multiple ways in which transpeople have lived their lives prior to accessing psychiatric assessment in a gender clinic. This may be because transpeople may be reluctant to relay anything to the gender clinic psychiatrists that may be viewed as different from the perceived ‘correct’ trans narrative. Transpeople tend to tailor their clinical narratives because they realize that psychiatrists have the power to stop their transitioning process. This leads transpeople to need to show distress to convince a psychiatrist.
Psychiatrists use a highly stereotyped notion of gender to provide a framework for assessing and treating transsexuals even though this stereotype may not be accurate. Psychiatrists fail to acknowledge the multiple ways for expressing and identifying with a particular gender (i.e. not necessarily only gender-conforming behaviour).
The heterosexual matrix refers to heterosexual gender roles being seen as natural rather than socially constructed. Intersex refers to the range of conditions affecting the chromosomal make-up (1), the reproductive system (2) and/or the sexual anatomy of a person (3).
The biological advocates of transsexuals state that gender identities are the product of biological dispositions. They claim that these dispositions are caused by hormonal influences in the foetus which produce feminized or masculinized neurological brain structure, which leads to a post-natal desire to transition. This, thus, claims that transsexualism is an innate, biological variation.
There are several things wrong with the biogenetic explanation:
- This explanation continues to stigmatize transsexuals.
- This explanation makes use of the gender binary.
- This explanation does not distinguish between gender role and gender identity.
- This explanation suggests that gender dysphoria unavoidably develops from an intersex condition which assumes that intersex people are either male or female.
- This explanation neglects environmental factors.
Many trans advocates argued in favour of gender dysphoria disorder for healthcare reasons (e.g. insurance pay). The standards of care stress that it is important for healthcare professionals to recognize that transpeople’s interventions need to be based on patient decision. The stigma surrounding transsexuality can only be reduced by depathologizing transsexuality. However, this may complicate the health care costs of transitioning.
Join with a free account for more service, or become a member for full access to exclusives and extra support of WorldSupporter >>
Concept of JoHo WorldSupporter
JoHo WorldSupporter mission and vision:
- JoHo wants to enable people and organizations to develop and work better together, and thereby contribute to a tolerant and sustainable world. Through physical and online platforms, it supports personal development and promote international cooperation is encouraged.
JoHo concept:
- As a JoHo donor, member or insured, you provide support to the JoHo objectives. JoHo then supports you with tools, coaching and benefits in the areas of personal development and international activities.
- JoHo's core services include: study support, competence development, coaching and insurance mediation when departure abroad.
Join JoHo WorldSupporter!
for a modest and sustainable investment in yourself, and a valued contribution to what JoHo stands for
- Login of registreer om te kunnen reageren
- 1536 keer gelezen
Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Interim exam 1 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
- Login of registreer om te kunnen reageren
- 2347 keer gelezen
Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Full course summary (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
- Login of registreer om te kunnen reageren
- 3333 keer gelezen
Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Article overview (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
- Login of registreer om te kunnen reageren
- 2152 keer gelezen
Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Interim exam 1 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
- “Eagly & Wood (2013). The nature-nurture debates: 25 years of challenges in understanding the psychology of gender.” – Article summary
- “Hyde & Delamater (2017). Gender roles and stereotypes.” – Article summary
- “Petersen & Hyde (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993 – 2007.” – Article summary
- “Vanwesenbeeck (2009). Doing gender in sex and sex research.” – Article summary
- “Cretella, Rosik, & Howsepian (2019). Sex and gender are distinct variables critical to health: Comment on Hyde, Bigler, Joel, Tate, and van Anders (2019).” – Article summary
- “Davy (2015). The DSM-5 and the politics of diagnosing transpeople.” – Article summary
- “Hyde et al. (2019). The future of sex and gender in psychology: Five challenges to the gender binary.” – Article summary
- “Kuyper & Wijsen (2013). Gender identities and gender dysphoria in the Netherlands.” – Article summary
- “Reilly (2019). Gender can be a continuous variable, not just a categorical one: Comment on Hyde, Bigler, Joel, Tate, and van Anders (2019). – Article summary
- “Zucker et al. (2013). Memo outlining evidence for change for gender identity disorder in the DSM-5.” – Article summary
- “Althof et al. (2017). Opinion paper: On the diagnosis/classification of sexual arousal concerns in women.” – Article summary
- “Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Lecture 1 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)”
- “Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Lecture 2 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)”
- “Balon & Clayton (2014). Female sexual interest/arousal disorder: A diagnosis out of thin air.” – Article summary
- “Basson (2014). On the definition of female sexual interest/arousal disorder.” – Article summary
- “Graham, Boyton, & Gould (2017). Challenging narratives of ‘dysfunction’. “ – Article summary
- “Graham, Brotto, & Zucker (2014). Response to Balon and Clayton (2014): Female sexual interest/arousal disorder is a diagnosis more on firm ground than thin air.” – Article summary
- “Hyde (2019). Kinds of sexual disorders.” – Article summary
- “Toates (2017). Explaining desire: Multiple perspectives.” – Article summary
- “Toates (2017). Arousal.” – Article summary
Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Full course summary (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
- “Eagly & Wood (2013). The nature-nurture debates: 25 years of challenges in understanding the psychology of gender.” – Article summary
- “Hyde & Delamater (2017). Gender roles and stereotypes.” – Article summary
- “Petersen & Hyde (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993 – 2007.” – Article summary
- “Vanwesenbeeck (2009). Doing gender in sex and sex research.” – Article summary
- “Cretella, Rosik, & Howsepian (2019). Sex and gender are distinct variables critical to health: Comment on Hyde, Bigler, Joel, Tate, and van Anders (2019).” – Article summary
- “Davy (2015). The DSM-5 and the politics of diagnosing transpeople.” – Article summary
- “Hyde et al. (2019). The future of sex and gender in psychology: Five challenges to the gender binary.” – Article summary
- “Kuyper & Wijsen (2013). Gender identities and gender dysphoria in the Netherlands.” – Article summary
- “Reilly (2019). Gender can be a continuous variable, not just a categorical one: Comment on Hyde, Bigler, Joel, Tate, and van Anders (2019). – Article summary
- “Zucker et al. (2013). Memo outlining evidence for change for gender identity disorder in the DSM-5.” – Article summary
- “Althof et al. (2017). Opinion paper: On the diagnosis/classification of sexual arousal concerns in women.” – Article summary
- “Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Lecture 1 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)”
- “Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Lecture 2 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)”
- “Balon & Clayton (2014). Female sexual interest/arousal disorder: A diagnosis out of thin air.” – Article summary
- “Basson (2014). On the definition of female sexual interest/arousal disorder.” – Article summary
- “Graham, Boyton, & Gould (2017). Challenging narratives of ‘dysfunction’. “ – Article summary
- “Graham, Brotto, & Zucker (2014). Response to Balon and Clayton (2014): Female sexual interest/arousal disorder is a diagnosis more on firm ground than thin air.” – Article summary
- “Hyde (2019). Kinds of sexual disorders.” – Article summary
- “Toates (2017). Explaining desire: Multiple perspectives.” – Article summary
- “Toates (2017). Arousal.” – Article summary
- “Brewin et al. (2009). Reformulating PTSD for DSM-V: Life after criterion A.” – Article summary
- “Cacioppo et al. (2015). Loneliness: Clinical import and interventions.” – Article summary
- “DiTomasso, Brannen-McNulty, Ross, & Burgess (2003). Attachment styles, social skills and loneliness in young adults.” – Article summary
- “DSM-5. Posttraumatic stress disorder.” – Article summary
- “Ozer, Lipsey, & Weiss (2003). Predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder and symptoms in adults: A meta-analysis.” – Article summary
- “Pincus & Gurtman (2006). Interpersonal theory and the interpersonal circumplex.” – Article summary
- “Schaver & Mikulincer (2011). An attachment-theory framework for conceptualizing interpersonal behaviour.” – Article summary
- “Ehlers & Clark (2000). A cognitive model of posttraumatic stress disorder.” – Article summary
- “Forest & Wood (2012). When social networking is not working: Individuals with low self-esteem recognize but do not reap the benefits of self-disclosure on Facebook.” – Article summary
- “Nadkarni & Hofmann (2012). Why do people use Facebook?” – Article summary
- “Van den Hout & Engelhard (2012). How does EMDR work?” – Article summary
- “Van Emmerik & Kamphuis (2015). Writing therapies for post-traumatic stress and post-traumatic stress disorder: A review of procedures and outcomes.” – Article summary
- “Watkins et al. (2018). Treating PTSD: A review of evidence-based psychotherapy interventions.” – Article summary
Work for JoHo WorldSupporter?
Volunteering: WorldSupporter moderators and Summary Supporters
Volunteering: Share your summaries or study notes
Student jobs: Part-time work as study assistant in Leiden

Contributions: posts
Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Interim exam 1 (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
This bundle contains all the information needed for the first interim exam for the course "Clinical Perspective on Today's Issues" given at the University of Amsterdam. It contains lecture information, information from the relevant books and all the articles. The following
...Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Full course summary (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
This bundle contains all the information needed for the for the course "Clinical Perspective on Today's Issues" given at the University of Amsterdam. It contains lecture information, information from the relevant books and all the articles. The following is included:
...Clinical Perspective on Today’s Issues – Article overview (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
This bundle contains all the articles included in the course "Clinical Perspective on Today's Issues" given at the University of Amsterdam. The following is included:
- “Eagly & Wood (2013). The nature-nurture debates: 25 years of challenges in understanding
Search only via club, country, goal, study, topic or sector










