Scientific & Statistical Reasoning – Article summary (UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM)
- 2939 reads
Join with a free account for more service, or become a member for full access to exclusives and extra support of WorldSupporter >>
People can get more polarized opinions after they have read the same article if they started off with opposing beliefs. This can be due to misinterpreting the evidence (1), different motivation (2) or other cognitive malfunctions (3).
Psychologists need to be critical thinkers, because they want to know the field and want to keep up with what is going on in the field of psychology.
Critical thinking requires to check for scientific soundness and not whether a paper matches with pre-existing beliefs, assumptions or other forms of bias. Scepticism of scientists towards their own work is valuable, as they then do not show the confirmation bias. There are several expectations a critical reader should have:
Volunteering: WorldSupporter moderators and Summary Supporters
Volunteering: Share your summaries or study notes
Student jobs: Part-time work as study assistant in Leiden


This bundle contains everything you need to know for the fifth interim exam for the course "Scientific & Statistical Reasoning" given at the University of Amsterdam. It contains both articles, book chapters and lectures. It consists of the following materials:
...This bundle contains all the summaries for the course "Scientific & Statistical Reasoning" given at the University of Amsterdam. It contains the following articles:
Add new contribution