JoHo kan jouw hulp goed gebruiken! Check hier de diverse studentenbanen die aansluiten bij je studie, je competenties verbeteren, je cv versterken en een bijdrage leveren aan een tolerantere wereld
Critical thinkingChapter 7Pseudo-reasoning Fallacies count as arguments in the sense that they fit our definition of an argument. They consist of a set of propositions, some of which premises, one of which is a conclusion. But, one way or another, they are bad arguments.A fallacy: a mistake in reasoning.One commits a fallacy when the reasons advanced or accepted in support of a claim fail to justify its acceptance.A fallacy can be committed either when one is deciding whether to accept a claim on the basis of a fallacious argument with which one has been presented or when one is presented the fallacious argument oneself.A fallacious argument or inference: one in which there is an inappropriate connection between premises and conclusion.Almost all fallacies fall under one of the following two types:Formal fallacies: the inappropriate connections are failures of logical connection. The argument of inference is neither deductively valid nor inductively forceful, even where all implicit premises have been made explicit.Substantive (or informal) fallacies: the inappropriate connections involve reliance on some very general unjustified assumptions or inferences. We need only make these premises explicit in order to see that they are false and unjustified. The implicit, false or dubious premise will be of a general nature, having nothing specifically to do with the subject matter of the argument.The majority of fallacies that we encounter in everyday texts and speech are substantive fallacies.A fallacious argument can have true or false premises.Simply having false premises does not make an argument fallacious.Nor does having true premises guarantee that...
Access options
The full content is only visible for Logged in WorldSupporters
More benefits of joining WorldSupporter
- You can use the navigation and follow your favorite supporters
- You can create your own content & add contributions & comments
- You can save your favorite content and make your own bundles
- See the menu for more benefits
Full access to all pages on World Supporter requires a JoHo membership
- For information about international JoHo memberships, read more here.
Support JoHo and support yourself by becoming a JoHo member
Become a Member
- for free to follow other supporters, see more content and use the tools
- for €10,- by becoming a member to see all content
Why create an account?
- Your WorldSupporter account gives you access to all functionalities of the platform
- Once you are logged in, you can:
- Save pages to your favorites
- Give feedback or share contributions
- participate in discussions
- share your own contributions through the 7 WorldSupporter tools
Studeren in het buitenland, stagelopen of onderzoek doen? Check welke verzekeringen voor jou van toepassing zijn via de JoHo Insurances Foundation, of bereid je vertrek naar het buitenland voor
Study or work abroad: check your insurance options
- 1 of 188
- next ›
Critical thinking: A concise guide by Bowell & Kemp (4th edition) - a summary
This is a summary of the book 'Critical thinking: A concise guide' by Bowell and Kemp. The topics in this summary are about constructing arguments and recognizing good from bad arguments. In this summary, everything second year psychology students at the uva need in the first block of WSRt is present.
Add new contribution