Lecture 6: Cultural Aspects of Clinical Neuropsychology


Culture and Clinical Neuropsychology: Theory

How can culture affect neuropsychological function?

Neuropsychology: study of the relationship between behaviour, emotion and cognition on one hand, and brain function on the other. 

Clinical neuropsychology(NP): assessing and cognitive, emotional and behavioural function after suspecting brain damage for diagnosis and potential treatment. 

Brain damage after trauma, vascular accidents, tumours, toxicity, infections, also (neurodegenerative) diseases, or just ageing. 

NP assessment: 'imperfect index of brain function'

Physical differences: brain - Brain plasticity can be affected by: specialized skill acquisition, enrichment, deprivation, education, health, stress, correlates of differing cognitive mechanisms, experience more generally. 

Cultural neuroscience: field with focus on factors that affect biologicals and psychological processes that reciprocally shape beliefs and norms shared by groups of individuals. 

Physical differences: genetics - Core of nature/nurture interactions!

Heredity: passing on characteristics from parents to children based on genetic material. Although about 99% of genes are fixed, 1% differs across individuals. Genes can have effects that depend on external variables.

Epigenetics: environmental factors cause genes to switch on or off without modification of the DNA sequence. Chemical tags can control genes in specific cells. Epigenetic tags can result from lifestyle choices or specific experience. Some epigenetic tags are hereditary! Part of our genetics that only become available in certain circumstances.

Physiological approach is relatively new! Questions:

  • How can the same physiological characteristics lead to different outcomes depending on one's culture?
  • How can the same culture lead to different outcomes depending on one's physiological characteristics?

The relation between biology and behaviours may depend on the cultural meaningsof behaviours, rather than on the actual behaviours. 

How does culture influence neuropsychological assessment?

Measuring brain function: NP assessment: intelligence; memory; verbal abilities; executive functions; visuo-spatial functions; attention; syndrome-related combinations; general batteries. The scores will be compared to normative data, sometimes with correlations for age or education level. 

Culture and NP assessment: Normative data based on very limited subsample WEIRD patients: which is partial and biased. 

There are several thousands of cultures, and over 6800 language spoken! Relative differences may vary. Biggest commonality is driven by schooling, science and technology (useful information spreads fast!)  

Why would culture affect NP assessment?

Values and meaning: no general agreement on merit responses (what is the right response): eg in the Raven's, do you go for aesthetics or for rules? Attitudes, eg are animals pets or food. 

Modes of knowing: individual task vs collective endeavour: why would it matter what I know when I'm part of a collective?

Conventions of communication: interaction: one-way questions, authority; and the type of questions (both in content and way of asking).

Patterns of abilities: Culture prescribes what should be learned, at what age, and by which gender. Results in culture-specific clusters of skills or abilities that 'belong' with a stage of life or role. Tests need to be appropriate for subject's learning opportunities and contextual experiences. 

Cultural values: culture dictates what is or is not situationally relevant and significant, or even appropriate. Based on values that are not necessarily shared! 

  • One-to one testing relationship with a stranger 
  • Background authority: why follow orders? 
  • Best performance: why try to get a high score?
  • Isolated environment: unusual social situation
  • Special type of communication: unusual language 
  • Speed: why trade off speed for accuracy? 
  • Private, embarrassing or subjective issues 
  • Specific testing materials and strategies

Familiarity

Testing situation: being tested is part of school culture! 

Attitudes that facilitate good performance: motivation, purpose

Elements used in testing: eg objects, situations, stories: animals, foods, plants, natural phenomena. 

Strategies needed to solve task: eg spelling is an artificial task in language with a phonological writing system; eg cardinal direction (north, south, east, west) not used in all cultures.

Language: Linguistic relativity: Whorfian hypothesis: language influences thought. Language use and the meaning differs with a cultural and subcultural background. Correlates strongly with education level, testing language often formal. Important to make test instructions understandable and appropriate!

Education: Accounts for up to 50% of variance in IQ tests, 0.6-38% in NP tests! Double role: increases knowledge of test content; increases familiarity with testing setting and strategies. Schooling increases test performance, smaller increases with each year of schooling. 

Illiteracy

Illiteracy: not being able to read or write 

Functional illiteracy: reading and writing is inadequate "to manage daily living and employment tasks that require reading skills beyond a basic level".

Literacy is generally higher in men than in women. 2/3 of illiterates are women. In Europe, North-America and Australia, literacy is closely tied to poverty: functional illiteracy can be high in specific groups!

Research in other countries: US, Canada, Mexico, Bermuda, Italy, Norway, and Switzerland. Investigated function: document literacy, prose literacy, numeracy and problem solving. All countries have significant numbers of people with low skills: between 1/3 and 2/3 do not attain minimum level demanded by increasingly complex knowledge economy. Especially the US and Italy show a large range in skills. Lower document literacy and numeracy also associated with poorer health. Interpreted as causing difficulties to navigate the health care system. Proportionally similar health rating between countries. 

Learning to read reinforces certain cognitive abilities, such as verbal memory, phonological awareness, and visuospatial discrimination. Illiterate individual show lower scores on: naming tasks, verbal fluency, verbal memory, visuo-perceptual abilities, conceptual functions and numerical abilities. 

Illiteracy: More difficulty copying nonsense figures or words. Concrete, real-life situations much easier to process! True for all kinds of tasks: naming, memory, visuospatial, etc. Standard test materials put illiterates at a disadvantage!

Effects of being in a minority group 

Minorities within a culture: different ethnic groups in one country; after migration (especially first-generation); groups with no country. In NP assessment, testing is approached from a majority culture perspective!  

Six potentially distinguishing variables: 

  • Nationality and legality 
  • Relative culture distance to majority culture 
  • Relative language distance to majority language 
  • Normality: how ‘strange’ is the minority culture perceived by the majority? 
  • Reference group: how big is the minority group? 
  • Social image: positive or negative attitudes of the majority group towards a minority group  

Necessity for specific tests and norms - Indication of functional level depends on relative scores. But: not clear hoe specific this needs to be: for each language? Cultural region? Educational level? SES level? Depends on cognitive function in question! Understanding the underlying variables is at least as important as having assess to specific norms. 

Potential psychological consequences of being a member of a minority group:

  • Homesickness – tends to start after 2-3 years and recurs even after long periods of time 
  • Frustration – difficulty in dealing with the environment, discrimination 
  • Isolation 
  • Cultural solitude – lack of understanding 
  • Decreased self-esteem – perceived as foolish or childish 
  • Paranoia – feeling different from everyone else 
  • Anger 
  • Depression 
  • Feelings of failure and/or success – minor successes can be perceived as very significant, also by other group members 

Acculturation

Strong identification with host culture

Weak identification with host culture

Strong identification with heritage culture

Integration/alternation

Positive attitudes toward host and heritage culture; participate in host culture while maintaining traditions of heritage culture; most successful strategy - least prejudice and greatest social support. 

Separation

 

Weak identification with heritage culture

Assimilation 

 

Marginalization

Negative attitudes toward host and heritage culture; no effort to engage with host and heritage cultures; rare and lest successful strategy; may characterize third culture kids

Discrimination and othering - Stereotypes and prejudice can lead to discrimination, which can be a large problem in contexts where there is intercultural interaction. Discrimination can affect the acculturation process in two ways: 

  1. Identity denial—questioning someone’s cultural identity because he or she does not match the prototype of the culture 
  2. Stereotype threat—anxieties about one’s group’s negative stereotypes lead one to confirm those stereotypes 

Discrimination has a range of negative effects on (mental) health, including High blood pressure; Heart problems; Low birth weight; Depression; Somatization; Risky behaviours such as smoking and alcohol use. 

Discrimination is very hard to study. It can be very subtle (othering). Incidents may not always be remembered or interpreted as discrimination. Effects may be moderated by coping and social support. Still an active research field, but many studies now point in this same direction of discrimination as a health risk. 

Summary part 1 - Neuropsychological assessment aims to provide an index of brain function. Physical differences may emerge based on hereditary and experiential factors. Culture can affect NP assessment in multiple ways: Patterns of abilities, cultural values, familiarity, language, education. Illiteracy affects the development of cognitive abilities. Being a member of a minority group can affect various aspects of well-being: Discrimination and other affect mental and physical health. 

Culture and Clinical Neuropsychology: Practice - clinical aspects

Implications for clinical practice

Neuropsychological practice in a multi-cultural society              Social aspects and care needs

MCI and dementia: how to diagnose?                                         What are the obstacles? 

Prevalence in different cultural groups                                      Solutions: culture-fair screenings 

Aging, prevalence of MCI and dementia

Aging - Cognitive functions decline with age. Not all! Memory and executive functions deteriorate more than vocabulary and world knowledge. Risk of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia increases with age.  

MCI - Mild cognitive impairment: Cognitive changes that are serious enough to be noticed, but not severe enough to interfere with daily life or independent function. Most common subtype of MCI first presents as memory impairment. Progression to dementia in 10 to 15% of afflicted persons per year. MCI as a precursor for dementia.  

DementiaUmbrella term for symptoms caused by neural disorders, especially cognitive symptoms. Most common causes of dementia:

  • Alzheimer’s disease: 50-80% 
  • Vascular dementia: 20% 
  • Dementia with Lewy bodies 15% 
  • Frontotemporal dementia 5% 

Each have own most prominent symptoms, all interfere with everyday activities. Data come from Western sample! 

How do we screen for dementia? - MMSE: Mini-Mental Screening Exam (Maximum score=30, dementia is indicated for scores below 24) --> screening, not diagnosing! Kinds of items: orientation to time and place; naming; registration (responding to prompts); attention and calculation; recall; repetition; complex command (figure). 

DSM 5 name for dementia: Major neurocognitive disorder 

Obstacles to good diagnosis

Prevalence - MCI prevalence = 3.0 - 19.0%, with a risk of developing dementia of 11-33% within 2 years. Dementia prevalence = 5.4 - 6.4% (≥60 years). Not the same everywhere! Related to wealth! Higher prevalence MCI and dementia described for immigrant populations in USA and UK 

More dementia in poorer countries: the predictions are that the proportion of people with dementia will increase under low- and middle-income countries.  

Migrant groups in the Netherlands - In the Netherlands, 11.1% of the population in 2010 consisted of migrants (8.5% from outside the EU). Turkish, Moroccan and Surinamese people make up 65% of all non-western immigrants in NL (i.e. born abroad to foreign parents). First-generation non-western immigrants are aging: 4% of population in 2013, to 15% in 2039. Native Dutch older group grows a bit less fast: 18% to 28%. Older immigrants in the US show a higher prevalence of risk factors for dementia. Diabetes, cardiovascular disease, obesity, smoking, hypertension, high cholesterol, low SES.

Care experts - Among European dementia experts, 64% find it more challenging to assess dementia in patients from ethnic minorities. Reported problems include: Language proficiency (88%); Presentation of symptoms (84%); Educational level (84%); Lacking assessment tools (68%); Lacking cultural knowledge (44-56%). 

Over- and underdiagnoses - Accurate diagnosis: High sensitivity(good true detection) and high specificity(low false detection). 

Findings from Denmark: Belief: dementia is underdiagnosed in migrant groups; Finding: in general health care, immigrant groups show different rates of diagnosis than native Danish. Turkish, Pakistani and Ex-Yugoslavian groups (no difference!). Finding: Age effect: overdiagnosis for younger people (<60y) and underdiagnoses for older people. Belief supported, but only for the older group! 

Reasons for over and underdiagnoses? 

Differences in help-seeking behaviour 

  • Stigma on illness, especially dementia 
  • More inclined to solve problems within the family 
  • Insufficient knowledge of dementia 

Difficulty with the health care system 

  • Language barrier 
  • Literacy skills 

Assessment and diagnosis 

  • Language & literacy 
  • Test-wiseness   

Examples of culture-fair diagnostic tool: CCD

Culture-fair diagnosis - From the first week: culture-fair testing! From the previous part: need to account for cultural values, familiarity, language, different education levels, interpretation of norms, etc 

Daily practice in a memory clinic: 

  • In which province are we? (MMSE) 
  • Who is our prime minister? (CST) 
  • Read and follow this instruction (MMSE) 
  • What is this? 

Cross-cultural dementia screening (CCD): Developed in Amsterdam, Validated in 2009, norm data from 2013. Instructions in own language; Culture-free/fair items; Nonverbal as much as possible. Domains: Memory, mental speed, executive function 

CCD tasks:

Memory: Objects testremember objects among distractors 

  • Household items shown in coloured pictures 
  • Immediate and delayed recognition 

Mental speed and divided attentionDots test: connect objects in order of increasing numbers 

  • Adjusted Trail-Making Test, looks like dominoes 
  • Using black and white dominoes instead of numbers and 
    letters 

Mental speed and inhibitionSun-moon test: cross-name pictures in own language 

  • Adjusted Stroop task using only pictures 
  • Takes speed and accuracy into account 

Interpreters - CCD developed in 6 languages: Dutch, Turkish, Moroccan- Arabic, Moroccan-Tarifit, Sranantongo, Sarnámi-Hindustani. Interpreters that are not family are preferred. Shameful for patient, covering up by interpreter. Native testers are ideal! Interpreters no longer covered by Dutch insurance since 2012. 

CCD evaluation- Total battery:

  • Sensitivity (true detection of dementia): 85% 
  • Specificity (true detection of no dementia): 89% 

(MMSE: sensitivity=76%, specificity=.83)

All subtests showed good individual sensitivity and specificity. Strongest predictors of dementia: Objects test B (delayed) and Sun-Moon test B (Interference). 

Dementia research in migrant groups - Evidence on dementia prevalence is rare in many regions 

  • Denmark: Turkish immigrants show a higher prevalence of dementia than native Danish (13.5% vs 7.0%)
  • Netherlands: SYMBOL study(SYstematic Memory testing Beholding OLder Migrants)

Symbol study - Aim: to assess the prevalence of MCI and dementia in community-dwelling migrants ≥ 55yrs, and to map their and their caregivers’ health care use and care needs. Hypothesis: prevalence MCI and dementia for older immigrants =2x prevalence in native Dutch. Large sample of older community-dwelling immigrants was screened with ‘Cross-Cultural Dementia screening instrument’ (CCD) to overcome barriers of culture  

Ran from 2010-2013. Participants: Adults from Turkey, Morocco, Surinam or NL over 55, recruited through GP in low SES suburbs -> cross-sectional! 

Measures: 

  • Various questionnaires comprising a geriatric assessment 
    (health indices and comorbidities, quality of life, daily activities, social activities, mood, depression, demographics) 
  • CCD for cognitive screening: memory, mental speed, executive function 
    SYMBOL STUDY RESULTS 
    Prevalence of MCI and dementia in each group 

Results - Conclusion: MCI and dementia were three to four times more prevalent in the majority of non-western immigrant groups when compared to the native Dutch population. These differences are important for planning and improving healthcare facilities! 

Implications - Need for specific care: adjustments in health care institutions. Broad use of culture-fair diagnostic tools: more focus necessary on the reliability of existing tools. Adjustments in care homes: food, activities, languages. Increasing awareness among migrant groups: dementia is stigmatized, affected people do not seek help. With a growing group of elderly migrants, this issue will become increasingly important. 

Summary part 2 - With an aging population, there is a growing group of migrants who need neuropsychological care. Some migrant groups show higher indices of predictors of dementia (cf. physical health, education). Dementia can be underdiagnosed but also overdiagnosed. Culture-fair diagnostic tools are needed to provide fitting care. CCD is an instrument developed to have culture-free items, many nonverbal responses. Prevalence of dementia indeed shown to be higher in migrant groups using appropriate diagnostic tools. 

Take home points - Clinical neuropsychological assessment is affected by culture in various ways, that each have different solutions! Theoretical considerations include: Neural and cognitive effects of experience (education, SES) and cultural factors that affect specific test outcomes. Clinical considerations should include: 

  • Relative distance in culture and language 
  • Adjusting the testing situation 
  • Adjusting the testing material 
  • Critical interpretation of test results and norms 
Page access
Public
Comments, Compliments & Kudos

Add new contribution

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Promotions
Image
The JoHo Insurances Foundation is specialized in insurances for travel, work, study, volunteer, internships an long stay abroad
Check the options on joho.org (international insurances) or go direct to JoHo's https://www.expatinsurances.org